The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Solid-state electronic spin coherence time approaching one second
Open accessAbstract
Solid-state spin systems such as nitrogen-vacancy colour centres in diamond are promising for applications of quantum information, sensing and metrology. However, a key challenge for such solid-state systems is to realize a spin coherence time that is much longer than the time for quantum spin manipulation protocols. Here we demonstrate an improvement of more than two orders of magnitude in the spin coherence time (T2) of nitrogen-vacancy centres compared with previous measurements: T2≈0.6 s at 77 K. We employed dynamical decoupling pulse sequences to suppress nitrogen-vacancy spin decoherence, and found that T2 is limited to approximately half of the longitudinal spin relaxation time over a wide range of temperatures, which we attribute to phonon-induced decoherence. Our results apply to ensembles of nitrogen-vacancy spins, and thus could advance quantum sensing, enable squeezing and many-body entanglement, and open a path to simulating driven, interaction-dominated quantum many-body Hamiltonians. Nitrogen-vacancy centres in diamond are a promising route for solid-state quantum information processing and magnetometry, but longer coherence times are needed to optimize protocols. Here, Bar-Gill et al. suppress decoherence to realize nitrogen-vacancy spin coherence times approaching one second.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ladd, T. D., Jelezko, F., Laflamme, R., Nakamura, Y., Monroe, C., & O’Brien, J. L. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08812 · Cited by 3,592
Atom—Photon Interactions: Basic Process and Appilcations
Cohen‐Tannoudji, C., Dupont‐Roc, J., & Grynberg, G. (1998) · doi:10.1002/9783527617197 · Cited by 2,510
Cited by
An addressable quantum dot qubit with fault-tolerant control-fidelity
Veldhorst, M., Hwang, J. C. C., Yang, C. H., Leenstra, A. W., de Ronde, B., Dehollain, J. P., Muhonen, J. T., Hudson, F. E., Itoh, K. M., Morello, A., et al. (2014) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2014.216 · Cited by 940
Advances in quantum teleportation
Pirandola, S., Eisert, J., Weedbrook, C., Furusawa, A., & Braunstein, S. L. (2015) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2015.154 · Cited by 894
Material platforms for spin-based photonic quantum technologies
Atatüre, M., Englund, D., Vamivakas, N., Lee, S.-Y., & Wrachtrup, J. (2018) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-018-0008-9 · Cited by 766
Deterministic delivery of remote entanglement on a quantum network
Humphreys, P. C., Kalb, N., Morits, J. P. J., Schouten, R. N., Vermeulen, R. F. L., Twitchen, D. J., Markham, M., & Hanson, R. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0200-5 · Cited by 546
Quantum memories: emerging applications and recent advances
Heshami, K., England, D. G., Humphreys, P. C., Bustard, P. J., Acosta, V. M., Nunn, J., & Sussman, B. J. (2016) · Journal of Modern Optics · doi:10.1080/09500340.2016.1148212 · Cited by 503
Metadata
- Authors
- Bar-Gill, N., Pham, L. M., Jarmola, A., Budker, D., & Walsworth, R. L.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2013-04-23
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1743-1743
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2031862801
- Cited by
- 799
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.