The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spin-valley lifetimes in a silicon quantum dot with tunable valley splitting
Open accessAbstract
Although silicon is a promising material for quantum computation, the degeneracy of the conduction band minima (valleys) must be lifted with a splitting sufficient to ensure the formation of well-defined and long-lived spin qubits. Here we demonstrate that valley separation can be accurately tuned via electrostatic gate control in a metal–oxide–semiconductor quantum dot, providing splittings spanning 0.3–0.8 meV. The splitting varies linearly with applied electric field, with a ratio in agreement with atomistic tight-binding predictions. We demonstrate single-shot spin read-out and measure the spin relaxation for different valley configurations and dot occupancies, finding one-electron lifetimes exceeding 2 s. Spin relaxation occurs via phonon emission due to spin–orbit coupling between the valley states, a process not previously anticipated for silicon quantum dots. An analytical theory describes the magnetic field dependence of the relaxation rate, including the presence of a dramatic rate enhancement (or hot-spot) when Zeeman and valley splittings coincide. The presence of multiple minima, or valleys, in the conduction band of group IV semiconductors can be a problem for spin-based quantum computing, but can also enable alternative qubit implementations. Yang et al. demonstrate electrostatic control of the valleys’ energy splitting in a silicon quantum dot.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electronic properties of two-dimensional systems
Ando, T., Fowler, A. B., & Stern, F. (1982) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.54.437 · Cited by 7,455
A silicon-based nuclear spin quantum computer
Kane, B. E. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30156 · Cited by 3,779
Cited by
Schaibley, J. R., Yu, H., Clark, G., Rivera, P., Ross, J. S., Seyler, K. L., Yao, W., & Xu, X. (2016) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2016.55 · Cited by 2,652
An addressable quantum dot qubit with fault-tolerant control-fidelity
Veldhorst, M., Hwang, J. C. C., Yang, C. H., Leenstra, A. W., de Ronde, B., Dehollain, J. P., Muhonen, J. T., Hudson, F. E., Itoh, K. M., Morello, A., et al. (2014) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2014.216 · Cited by 940
Self-citationInterfacing spin qubits in quantum dots and donors—hot, dense, and coherent
Vandersypen, L. M. K., Bluhm, H., Clarke, J. S., Dzurak, A. S., Ishihara, R., Morello, A., Reilly, D. J., Schreiber, L. R., & Veldhorst, M. (2017) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-017-0038-y · Cited by 624
Self-citationSilicon CMOS architecture for a spin-based quantum computer
Veldhorst, M., Eenink, H. G. J., Yang, C. H., & Dzurak, A. S. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01905-6 · Cited by 398
Self-citationQubits made by advanced semiconductor manufacturing
Zwerver, A. M. J., Krähenmann, T., Watson, T. F., Lampert, L., George, H. C., Pillarisetty, R., Bojarski, S. A., Amin, P., Amitonov, S. V., Boter, J. M., et al. (2022) · Nature Electronics · doi:10.1038/s41928-022-00727-9 · Cited by 364
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, C. H., Rossi, A., Ruskov, R., Lai, N. S., Mohiyaddin, F. A., Lee, S., Tahan, C., Klimeck, G., Morello, A., & Dzurak, A. S.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2013-06-27
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2069-2069
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1998025105
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.