Cited by 199melanin and skin pigmentationSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical StudiesPhotochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies

Excitonic effects from geometric order and disorder explain broadband optical absorption in eumelanin

Open access
Chen, Chun-Teh, Chuang, Chern, Cao, Jianshu, Ball, Vincent, Ruch, David, Buehler, Markus J.·2014·Nature Communications

Abstract

Eumelanin is a ubiquitous biological pigment, and the origin of its broadband absorption spectrum has long been a topic of scientific debate. Here, we report a first-principles computational investigation to explain its broadband absorption feature. These computations are complemented by experimental results showing a broadening of the absorption spectra of dopamine solutions upon their oxidation. We consider a variety of eumelanin molecular structures supported by experiments or theoretical studies, and calculate the absorption spectra with proper account of the excitonic couplings based on the Frenkel exciton model. The interplay of geometric order and disorder of eumelanin aggregate structures broadens the absorption spectrum and gives rise to a relative enhancement of absorption intensity at the higher-energy end, proportional to the cube of absorption energy. These findings show that the geometric disorder model is as able as the chemical disorder model, and complements this model, to describe the optical properties of eumelanin.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms4859

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, C.-T., Chuang, C., Cao, J., Ball, V., Ruch, D., & Buehler, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Centre de recherche public Henri-Tudor (LU)
Corresponding author
Buehler, Markus J.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2014-05-22
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
3859-3859
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2012184523
Cited by
199
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 1
FWCI
6.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Energy (DESC0001088)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
Keywords
eumelanin, broadband light absorption, excitonic coupling, Frenkel excitons, geometric disorder, chemical disorder, aggregate structure, dopamine oxidation, stacking interactions, biological pigments
MeSH terms
Dopamine, Electrons, Melanins, Oxidation-Reduction, Solutions, Spectrum Analysis, Optical Phenomena, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Absorption, Physicochemical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review