Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 607

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A pan-cancer proteomic perspective on The Cancer Genome Atlas

Open access
Akbani, Rehan, Ng, Patrick Kwok Shing, Werner, Henrica M. J., Shahmoradgoli, Maria, Zhang, Fan, Ju, Zhenlin, Liu, Wenbin, Yang, Ji-Yeon, Yoshihara, Kosuke, Li, Jun, Ling, Shiyun, Seviour, Elena G., Ram, Prahlad T., Minna, John D., Diao, Lixia, Tong, Pan, Heymach, John V., Hill, Steven M., Dondelinger, Frank, Städler, Nicolas, Byers, Lauren A., Meric-Bernstam, Funda, Weinstein, John N., Broom, Bradley M., Verhaak, Roeland G. W., Liang, Han, Mukherjee, Sach, Lu, Yiling, Mills, Gordon B.·2014·Nature Communications

Abstract

Protein levels and function are poorly predicted by genomic and transcriptomic analysis of patient tumours. Therefore, direct study of the functional proteome has the potential to provide a wealth of information that complements and extends genomic, epigenomic and transcriptomic analysis in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) projects. Here we use reverse-phase protein arrays to analyse 3,467 patient samples from 11 TCGA ‘Pan-Cancer’ diseases, using 181 high-quality antibodies that target 128 total proteins and 53 post-translationally modified proteins. The resultant proteomic data are integrated with genomic and transcriptomic analyses of the same samples to identify commonalities, differences, emergent pathways and network biology within and across tumour lineages. In addition, tissue-specific signals are reduced computationally to enhance biomarker and target discovery spanning multiple tumour lineages. This integrative analysis, with an emphasis on pathways and potentially actionable proteins, provides a framework for determining the prognostic, predictive and therapeutic relevance of the functional proteome. Analyses of genome and transcriptome data are unable to accurately predict protein levels and function in tumour samples. Here, the authors carry out a comprehensive protein analysis in 3,467 samples from the cancer genome atlas, providing a resource to study the prognostic and therapeutic potential of tumour proteins.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms4887

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 607

Metadata

Authors
Akbani, R., Ng, P. K. S., Werner, H. M. J., Shahmoradgoli, M., Zhang, F., Ju, Z., Liu, W., Yang, J.-Y., Yoshihara, K., Li, J., Ling, S., Seviour, E. G., Ram, P. T., Minna, J. D., Diao, L., Tong, P., Heymach, J. V., Hill, S. M., Dondelinger, F., Städler, N., Byers, L. A., Meric-Bernstam, F., Weinstein, J. N., Broom, B. M., Verhaak, R. G. W., Liang, H., Mukherjee, S., Lu, Y., & Mills, G. B.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2014-05-29
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
3887-3887
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010522003
Cited by
607
References
11
FWCI
20.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.