The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ternary metal fluorides as high-energy cathodes with low cycling hysteresis
Open accessAbstract
Transition metal fluorides are an appealing alternative to conventional intercalation compounds for use as cathodes in next-generation lithium batteries due to their extremely high capacity (3–4 times greater than the current state-of-the-art). However, issues related to reversibility, energy efficiency and kinetics prevent their practical application. Here we report on the synthesis, structural and electrochemical properties of ternary metal fluorides (M 1yM 21-yFx: M 1, M 2=Fe, Cu), which may overcome these issues. By substituting Cu into the Fe lattice, forming the solid–solution CuyFe 1-yF 2, reversible Cu and Fe redox reactions are achieved with surprisingly small hysteresis (<150 mV). This finding indicates that cation substitution may provide a new avenue for tailoring key electrochemical properties of conversion electrodes. Although the reversible capacity of Cu conversion fades rapidly, likely due to Cu+ dissolution, the low hysteresis and high energy suggest that a Cu-based fluoride cathode remains an intriguing candidate for rechargeable lithium batteries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Python Materials Genomics (pymatgen): A robust, open-source python library for materials analysis
Ong, S. P., Richards, W. D., Jain, A., Hautier, G., Kocher, M., Cholia, S., Gunter, D., Chevrier, V. L., Persson, K. A., & Ceder, G. (2013) · Computational Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.028 · Cited by 4,534
Cited by
Fundamentals, status and promise of sodium-based batteries
Usiskin, R., Lu, Y., Popovic, J., Law, M., Balaya, P., Hu, Y.-S., & Maier, J. (2021) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-021-00324-w · Cited by 1,370
Gao, L., Cui, X., Sewell, C. D., Li, J., & Lin, Z. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00962h · Cited by 1,038
Electrode Degradation in Lithium-Ion Batteries
Pender, J. P., Jha, G., Youn, D. H., Ziegler, J. M., Andoni, I., Choi, E. J., Heller, A., Dunn, B. S., Weiss, P. S., Penner, R. M., et al. (2020) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.9b04365 · Cited by 873
Advances in the Cathode Materials for Lithium Rechargeable Batteries
Lee, W., Muhammad, S., Sergey, C., Lee, H., Yoon, J., Kang, Y., & Yoon, W. (2020) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201902359 · Cited by 577
Niu, F., Yang, J., Wang, N., Zhang, D., Fan, W., Yang, J., & Qian, Y. (2017) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201700522 · Cited by 543
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, F., Kim, S.-W., Seo, D.-H., Kang, K., Wang, L., Su, D., Vajo, J. J., Wang, J., & Graetz, J.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2015-03-26
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 6668-6668
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1967574772
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.