Cited by 158Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsChromatin Remodeling and CancerEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

High-throughput and quantitative assessment of enhancer activity in mammals by CapStarr-seq

Open access
Vanhille, Laurent, Griffon, Aurélien, Maqbool, Muhammad Ahmad, Zacarias-Cabeza, Joaquin, Dao, Lan T.M., Fernandez, Nicolas, Ballester, Benoit, Andrau, Jean Christophe +1 more·2015·Nature Communications

Abstract

Cell-type specific regulation of gene expression requires the activation of promoters by distal genomic elements defined as enhancers. The identification and the characterization of enhancers are challenging in mammals due to their genome complexity. Here we develop CapStarr-Seq, a novel high-throughput strategy to quantitatively assess enhancer activity in mammals. This approach couples capture of regions of interest to previously developed Starr-seq technique. Extensive assessment of CapStarr-seq demonstrates accurate quantification of enhancer activity. Furthermore, we find that enhancer strength is associated with binding complexity of tissue-specific transcription factors and super-enhancers, while additive enhancer activity isolates key genes involved in cell identity and function. The CapStarr-Seq thus provides a fast and cost-effective approach to assess the activity of potential enhancers for a given cell type and will be helpful in decrypting transcription regulation mechanisms. Characterizing mammalian gene expression regulation by enhancer elements is complicated by the size and complexity of the genome. Here Vanhille et al.demonstrate CapStarr-Seq, a novel high-throughput method for assessing potential enhancers and deciphering the mechanisms regulating transcription

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms7905

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MPRAs have been applied to assess biochemically annotated candidate enhancers, candidate enhancers harbouring variants that potentially mediate eQTLs, and even scans of the entire human genome.

    “MPRAs have been applied to assess biochemically annotated candidate enhancers77,176-178, candidate enhancers harbouring variants that potentially mediate eQTLs179-182, and even scans of the entire human genome108,183.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Mombaerts, P., Terhorst, C., Jacks, T., Tonegawa, S. & Sancho, J. Characterization of immature thymocyte lines derived from T-cell receptor or recombination activating gene 1 and p53 double mutant mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 7420-7424 (1995).
  2. Homer, N., Merriman, B. & Nelson, S. F. BFAST: an alignment tool for large scale genome resequencing. PLoS ONE 4, e7767 (2009).
  3. Lepoivre, C. et al. Divergent transcription is associated with promoters of transcriptional regulators. BMC Genomics 14, 914 (2013).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vanhille, L., Griffon, A., Maqbool, M. A., Zacarias-Cabeza, J., Dao, L. T. M., Fernandez, N., Ballester, B., Andrau, J. C., & Spicuglia, S.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Spicuglia, Salvatore
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2015-04-15
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
6905-6905
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091688007
Cited by
158
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11
FWCI
7.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL AMU (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Aix-Marseille Université (ANR 11-IDEX-0001-02)
  • Infrastructures en Biologie Santé et Agronomie
  • European Commission (262055, 282510, 2007–2013, FP7 2007-2013, FP7/2007)
  • Science Foundation Ireland
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-IDEX-0001, ANR11IDEX000102, ANR-10-INBS-0009, ANR- 10-INBS-09, ANR-11-IDEX, ANR-10, IDEX-0001-02, 10-INBS-09)
  • Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (ANR-11-IDEX-0001-02)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
enhancer activity, transcriptional regulation, super-enhancers, tissue-specific transcription factors, cell identity genes, cell type-specific gene expression, mammalian gene regulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Gene Expression Regulation, Male, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Transcription Factors, Gene Expression, Sequence Analysis, DNA, NIH 3T3 Cells, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, Mice, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review