Cited by 2,961Protein Degradation and InhibitorsChromatin Remodeling and CancerGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Selective Inhibition of Tumor Oncogenes by Disruption of Super-Enhancers

Open access
Lovén, Jakob, Hoke, Heather A., Lin, Charles Y., Lau, Ashley, Orlando, David A., Vakoc, Christopher R., Bradner, James E., Lee, Tong Ihn +1 more·2013·Cell

Abstract

Chromatin regulators have become attractive targets for cancer therapy, but it is unclear why inhibition of these ubiquitous regulators should have gene-specific effects in tumor cells. Here, we investigate how inhibition of the widely expressed transcriptional coactivator BRD4 leads to selective inhibition of the MYC oncogene in multiple myeloma (MM). BRD4 and Mediator were found to co-occupy thousands of enhancers associated with active genes. They also co-occupied a small set of exceptionally large super-enhancers associated with genes that feature prominently in MM biology, including the MYC oncogene. Treatment of MM tumor cells with the BET-bromodomain inhibitor JQ1 led to preferential loss of BRD4 at super-enhancers and consequent transcription elongation defects that preferentially impacted genes with super-enhancers, including MYC. Super-enhancers were found at key oncogenic drivers in many other tumor cells. These observations have implications for the discovery of cancer therapeutics directed at components of super-enhancers in diverse tumor types.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.036

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SEs in both HCC and TAN are associated with GO terms related to metabolic genes (e.g. CYP3A4, SLC38A4, IGFBP1).

    “SEs in both HCC and TAN were associated with GO terms related to metabolic genes (e.g. CYP3A4, SLC38A4, and IGFBP1) (Fig. 2c)20,21,58.”

    From Multi-omic analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma reveals aberrant cis-regulatory changes and dysregulated retrotransposons with prognostic potential (2025) · cites this paper as [58]

    The Results section on other cancers examines super-enhancers in glioblastoma and small-cell lung cancer, not HCC or tumor-adjacent normal tissue. Searches for HCC, TAN, the three named genes, and metabolic GO terms found no passage addressing the claimed association. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lovén, J., Hoke, H. A., Lin, C. Y., Lau, A., Orlando, D. A., Vakoc, C. R., Bradner, J. E., Lee, T. I., & Young, R. A.
Affiliations
  • Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (US)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Young, Richard A.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
153
Issue
2
Pages
320-334
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1523117612
Cited by
2,961
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 140 · 2025: 214 · 2024: 261 · 2023: 254 · 2022: 271 · 2021: 327 · 2020: 263 · 2019: 248 · 2018: 218 · 2017: 205 · 2016: 184 · 2015: 175 · 2014: 143 · 2013: 53
FWCI
83.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p30ca045508-35)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (HG002668, R01HG002668)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA146445, R01CA146445, P30-CA045508, CA45508, P30CA014051)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
super-enhancers, BRD4, MYC oncogene, multiple myeloma, BET inhibitors, JQ1, Mediator complex, transcriptional coactivator, transcription elongation, chromatin regulators, cancer therapy, enhancer disruption
MeSH terms
Bromodomain Containing Proteins, Antineoplastic Agents, Azepines, Chromatin, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Humans, Multiple Myeloma, Neoplasms, Nuclear Proteins, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic, Triazoles, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Cell Cycle Proteins, Cell Line, Tumor, Genome-Wide Association Study, Mediator Complex, Transcription Elongation, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review