Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 366

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recurrent somatic mutation of FAT1 in multiple human cancers leads to aberrant Wnt activation

Open access
Morris, Luc G T, Kaufman, Andrew M, Gong, Yongxing, Ramaswami, Deepa, Walsh, Logan A, Turcan, Şevin, Eng, Stephanie, Kannan, Kasthuri, Zou, Yilong, Peng, Luke, Banuchi, Victoria E, Paty, Phillip, Zeng, Zhaoshi, Vakiani, Efsevia, Solit, David, Singh, Bhuvanesh, Ganly, Ian, Liau, Linda, Cloughesy, Timothy C, Mischel, Paul S, Mellinghoff, Ingo K, Chan, Timothy A·2013·Nature Genetics

Abstract

Aberrant Wnt signaling can drive cancer development. In many cancer types, the genetic basis of Wnt pathway activation remains incompletely understood. Here, we report recurrent somatic mutations of the Drosophila melanogaster tumor suppressor–related gene FAT1 in glioblastoma (20.5%), colorectal cancer (7.7%), and head and neck cancer (6.7%). FAT1 encodes a cadherin-like protein, which we found is able to potently suppress cancer cell growth in vitro and in vivo by binding β-catenin and antagonizing its nuclear localization. Inactivation of FAT1 via mutation therefore promotes Wnt signaling and tumorigenesis and affects patient survival. Taken together, these data strongly point to FAT1 as a tumor suppressor gene driving loss of chromosome 4q35, a prevalent region of deletion in cancer. Loss of FAT1 function is a frequent event during oncogenesis. These findings address two outstanding issues in cancer biology: the basis of Wnt activation in non-colorectal tumors and the identity of a 4q35 tumor suppressor.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ng.2538

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 87 references

Cited by

See all 366

Metadata

Authors
Morris, L. G. T., Kaufman, A. M., Gong, Y., Ramaswami, D., Walsh, L. A., Turcan, Ş., Eng, S., Kannan, K., Zou, Y., Peng, L., Banuchi, V. E., Paty, P., Zeng, Z., Vakiani, E., Solit, D., Singh, B., Ganly, I., Liau, L., Cloughesy, T. C., Mischel, P. S., Mellinghoff, I. K., & Chan, T. A.
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2013-01-27
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
253-261
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W1971176522
Cited by
366
References
87
FWCI
11.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recurrent somatic mutation of FAT1 in multiple human cancers leads to aberrant Wnt activation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ng.2538
The paper
Morris, L. G. T., Kaufman, A. M., Gong, Y., Ramaswami, D., Walsh, L. A., Turcan, Ş., Eng, S., Kannan, K., Zou, Y., Peng, L., Banuchi, V. E., Paty, P., Zeng, Z., Vakiani, E., Solit, D., Singh, B., Ganly, I., Liau, L., Cloughesy, T. C., . . . Chan, T. A. (2013). Recurrent somatic mutation of FAT1 in multiple human cancers leads to aberrant Wnt activation. Nature Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2538

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.