Cited by 324Epigenetics and DNA MethylationGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research

Large conserved domains of low DNA methylation maintained by Dnmt3a

Open access
Jeong, Mira, Sun, Deqiang, Luo, Min, Huang, Yun, Challen, Grant A, Rodriguez, Benjamin, Zhang, Xiaotian, Chavez, Lukas +14 more·2014·Nature Genetics

Abstract

Gains and losses in DNA methylation are prominent features of mammalian cell types. To gain insight into the mechanisms that promote shifts in DNA methylation and contribute to changes in cell fate, including malignant transformation, we performed genome-wide mapping of 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in purified mouse hematopoietic stem cells. We discovered extended regions of low methylation (canyons) that span conserved domains frequently containing transcription factors and are distinct from CpG islands and shores. About half of the genes in these methylation canyons are coated with repressive histone marks, whereas the remainder are covered by activating histone marks and are highly expressed in hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). Canyon borders are demarked by 5-hydroxymethylcytosine and become eroded in the absence of DNA methyltransferase 3a (Dnmt3a). Genes dysregulated in human leukemias are enriched for canyon-associated genes. The new epigenetic landscape we describe may provide a mechanism for the regulation of hematopoiesis and may contribute to leukemia development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ng.2836

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. [1]Bird A Taggart M Frommer M Miller OJ Macleod D A fraction of the mouse genome that is derived from islands of nonmethylated, CpG-rich DNA Cell 1985 40 91 99 2981636
  2. [2]Irizarry RA The human colon cancer methylome shows similar hypo- and hypermethylation at conserved tissue-specific CpG island shores Nat Genet 2009 41 178 186 19151715 PMC2729128
  3. [3]Ley TJ DNMT3A mutations in acute myeloid leukemia N Engl J Med 2010 363 2424 2433 21067377 PMC3201818
  4. [4]Yan XJ Exome sequencing identifies somatic mutations of DNA methyltransferase gene DNMT3A in acute monocytic leukemia Nat Genet 2011 43 309 315 21399634
  5. [5]Delhommeau F Mutation in TET2 in myeloid cancers N Engl J Med 2009 360 2289 2301 19474426
  6. [6]Abdel-Wahab O Genetic characterization of TET1, TET2, and TET3 alterations in myeloid malignancies Blood 2009 114 144 147 19420352 PMC2710942
  7. [7]Lister R Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences Nature 2009 462 315 322 19829295 PMC2857523
  8. [8]Stadler MB DNA-binding factors shape the mouse methylome at distal regulatory regions Nature 2011 480 490 495 22170606
  9. [9]Ziller MJ Genomic distribution and inter-sample variation of non-CpG methylation across human cell types PLoS Genet 2011 7 e1002389 22174693 PMC3234221
  10. [10]Hodges E Directional DNA methylation changes and complex intermediate states accompany lineage specificity in the adult hematopoietic compartment Mol Cell 2011 44 17 28 21924933 PMC3412369
  11. [11]Gardiner-Garden M Frommer M CpG islands in vertebrate genomes J Mol Biol 1987 196 261 282 3656447
  12. [12]Lowe CB Bejerano G Haussler D Thousands of human mobile element fragments undergo strong purifying selection near developmental genes Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007 104 8005 8010 17463089 PMC1876562
  13. [13]Hendrix DA Hong JW Zeitlinger J Rokhsar DS Levine MS Promoter elements associated with RNA Pol II stalling in the Drosophila embryo Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008 105 7762 7767 18505835 PMC2396556
  14. [14]Bellen HJ The Drosophila gene disruption project: progress using transposons with distinctive site specificities Genetics 2011 188 731 743 21515576 PMC3176542
  15. [15]Akalin A Transcriptional features of genomic regulatory blocks Genome Biol 2009 10 R38 19374772 PMC2688929
  16. [16]Kikuta H Genomic regulatory blocks encompass multiple neighboring genes and maintain conserved synteny in vertebrates Genome Res 2007 17 545 555 17387144 PMC1855176
  17. [17]Whyte WA Master transcription factors and mediator establish super-enhancers at key cell identity genes Cell 2013 153 307 319 23582322 PMC3653129
  18. [18]Wilson NK Combinatorial transcriptional control in blood stem/progenitor cells: genome-wide analysis of ten major transcriptional regulators Cell Stem Cell 2010 7 532 544 20887958
  19. [19]Bernstein BE A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells Cell 2006 125 315 326 16630819
  20. [20]Stadler MB DNA-binding factors shape the mouse methylome at distal regulatory regions Nature 2011 480 490 495 22170606
  21. [21]Coolen MW Consolidation of the cancer genome into domains of repressive chromatin by long-range epigenetic silencing (LRES) reduces transcriptional plasticity Nat Cell Biol 2010 12 235 246 20173741 PMC3058354
  22. [22]Bert SA Regional activation of the cancer genome by long-range epigenetic remodeling Cancer Cell 2013 23 9 22 23245995
  23. [23]Patel JP Prognostic relevance of integrated genetic profiling in acute myeloid leukemia N Engl J Med 2012 366 1079 1089 22417203 PMC3545649
  24. [25]Inoue A Zhang Y Replication-dependent loss of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mouse preimplantation embryos Science 2011 334 194 21940858 PMC3799877
  25. [27]Booth MJ Quantitative sequencing of 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine at single-base resolution Science 2012 336 934 937 22539555
  26. [28]Challen GA Dnmt3a is essential for hematopoietic stem cell differentiation Nat Genet 2012 44 23 31 22138693 PMC3637952
  27. [29]Roller A Landmark analysis of DNMT3A mutations in hematological malignancies Leukemia 2013 23519389
  28. [30]Jones PA Baylin SB The epigenomics of cancer Cell 2007 128 683 692 17320506 PMC3894624
  29. [31]Ganguly B Foi A Doctorovich F B KD T GR 5-Hy-droxy-3-methyl-5-phenyl-4,5-di-hydro-1H-pyrazole-1-carbothio-amide Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online 2011 67 o2777 PMC3201317 22065480
  30. [32]Xie W Epigenomic analysis of multilineage differentiation of human embryonic stem cells Cell 2013 153 1134 1148 23664764 PMC3786220
  31. [33]Ko M Impaired hydroxylation of 5-methylcytosine in myeloid cancers with mutant TET2 Nature 2010 468 839 843 21057493 PMC3003755
  32. [34]Goodell MA Brose K Paradis G Conner AS Mulligan RC Isolation and functional properties of murine hematopoietic stem cells that are replicating in vivo J Exp Med 1996 183 1797 1806 8666936 PMC2192511
  33. [35]Mayle A Luo M Jeong M Goodell MA Flow cytometry analysis of murine hematopoietic stem cells Cytometry A 2013 83 27 37 22736515 PMC3638885
  34. [36]Gu H Preparation of reduced representation bisulfite sequencing libraries for genome-scale DNA methylation profiling Nat Protoc 2011 6 468 481 21412275
  35. [37]Huang Y Pastor WA Zepeda-Martinez JA Rao A The anti-CMS technique for genome-wide mapping of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine Nat Protoc 2012 7 1897 1908 23018193 PMC3498982
  36. [38]Dahl JA Collas P A rapid micro chromatin immunoprecipitation assay (microChIP) Nat Protoc 2008 3 1032 1045 18536650
  37. [39]Xi Y Li W BSMAP: whole genome Bisulfite Sequence MAPping program BMC Bioinformatics 2009 10 232 19635165 PMC2724425
  38. [40]Lin X BSeQC: quality control of bisulfite sequencing experiments Bioinformatics 2013 PMC3842756 24064417
  39. [41]Zhang Y Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS) Genome Biol 2008 9 R137 18798982 PMC2592715
  40. [42]Li R SOAP2: an improved ultrafast tool for short read alignment Bioinformatics 2009 25 1966 1967 19497933
  41. [43]He, Y.-F. et al Tet-mediated formation of 5-carboxylcytosine and its excision by TDG in mammalian DNA Science (New York, NY) 2011 333 1303 1307 PMC3462231 21817016
  42. [44]Robinson M McCarthy D Smyth G edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data Bioinformatics 2009 PMC2796818 19910308
  43. [45]Simon R Analysis of gene expression data using BRB-ArrayTools Cancer Inform 2007 3 11 17 19455231 PMC2675854
  44. [46]Eisen MB Spellman PT Brown PO Botstein D Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998 95 14863 14868 9843981 PMC24541

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jeong, M., Sun, D., Luo, M., Huang, Y., Challen, G. A., Rodriguez, B., Zhang, X., Chavez, L., Wang, H., Hannah, R., Kim, S.-B., Yang, L., Ko, M., Chen, R., Göttgens, B., Lee, J.-S., Gunaratne, P., Godley, L. A., Darlington, G. J., Rao, A., Li, W., & Goodell, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • La Jolla Institute for Immunology (US)
  • Wellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute (GB)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
  • Li, Wei
  • Goodell, Margaret A
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2013-11-24
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
17-23
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2015493376
Cited by
324
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 1
FWCI
16.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Scholarworks@UNIST (Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (079249, 100140)
  • Cancer Research UK (12765)
  • National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (G0900729/1)
  • Medical Research Council (MC_PC_12009)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/I00050X/1)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG036562, RC2AG036562)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG007538)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA151535, CA151535, CA125123, CA126752, P30CA125123, P50CA126752)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (T32AI007495, AI07495)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K99DK084259, DK084259, DK092883, R56DK092883, R00DK084259, R01DK092883)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD065812)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Keywords
DNA methylation, 5-hydroxymethylcytosine, DNMT3A, hematopoietic stem cells, conserved domains, histone modifications, leukemia, hematopoiesis, epigenetic regulation, 5-methylcytosine
MeSH terms
DNA Methyltransferase 3A, Animals, Base Sequence, Cytosine, DNA (Cytosine-5-)-Methyltransferases, Gene Expression Regulation, Hematopoietic Stem Cells, Histones, Humans, Leukemia, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Mutant Strains, Conserved Sequence, CpG Islands, DNA Methylation, Databases, Genetic, Epigenesis, Genetic, 5-Methylcytosine, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review