Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 348

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ordering of mutations in preinvasive disease stages of esophageal carcinogenesis

Open access
the OCCAMS Consortium, Weaver, Jamie M J, Ross-Innes, Caryn S, Shannon, Nicholas, Lynch, Andy G, Forshew, Tim, Barbera, Mariagnese, Murtaza, Muhammed, Ong, Chin-Ann J, Lao-Sirieix, Pierre, Dunning, Mark J, Smith, Laura, Smith, Mike L, Anderson, Charlotte L, Carvalho, Benilton, O'Donovan, Maria, Underwood, Timothy J, May, Andrew P, Grehan, Nicola, Hardwick, Richard, Davies, Jim, Oloumi, Arusha, Aparicio, Sam, Caldas, Carlos, Eldridge, Matthew D, Edwards, Paul A W, Rosenfeld, Nitzan, Tavaré, Simon, Fitzgerald, Rebecca C·2014·Nature Genetics

Abstract

Cancer genome sequencing studies have identified numerous driver genes, but the relative timing of mutations in carcinogenesis remains unclear. The gradual progression from premalignant Barrett's esophagus to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) provides an ideal model to study the ordering of somatic mutations. We identified recurrently mutated genes and assessed clonal structure using whole-genome sequencing and amplicon resequencing of 112 EACs. We next screened a cohort of 109 biopsies from 2 key transition points in the development of malignancy: benign metaplastic never-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (NDBE; n = 66) and high-grade dysplasia (HGD; n = 43). Unexpectedly, the majority of recurrently mutated genes in EAC were also mutated in NDBE. Only TP53 and SMAD4 mutations occurred in a stage-specific manner, confined to HGD and EAC, respectively. Finally, we applied this knowledge to identify high-risk Barrett's esophagus in a new non-endoscopic test. In conclusion, mutations in EAC driver genes generally occur exceptionally early in disease development with profound implications for diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ng.3013

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 348

Metadata

Authors
the OCCAMS Consortium, Weaver, J. M. J., Ross-Innes, C. S., Shannon, N., Lynch, A. G., Forshew, T., Barbera, M., Murtaza, M., Ong, C.-A. J., Lao-Sirieix, P., Dunning, M. J., Smith, L., Smith, M. L., Anderson, C. L., Carvalho, B., O'Donovan, M., Underwood, T. J., May, A. P., Grehan, N., Hardwick, R., Davies, J., Oloumi, A., Aparicio, S., Caldas, C., Eldridge, M. D., Edwards, P. A. W., Rosenfeld, N., Tavaré, S., & Fitzgerald, R. C.
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2014-06-22
Volume
46
Issue
8
Pages
837-843
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2117910394
Cited by
348
References
7
FWCI
42.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.