Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 788

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genome-wide association study identifies five susceptibility loci for glioma

Open access
Shete, Sanjay, Hosking, Fay J, Robertson, Lindsay B, Dobbins, Sara E, Sanson, Marc, Malmer, Beatrice, Simon, Matthias, Marie, Yannick, Boisselier, Blandine, Delattre, Jean-Yves, Hoang-Xuan, Khe, Hallani, Soufiane El, Idbaih, Ahmed, Zelenika, Diana, Andersson, Ulrika, Henriksson, Roger, Bergenheim, A Tommy, Feychting, Maria, Lönn, Stefan, Ahlbom, Anders, Schramm, Johannes, Linnebank, Michael, Hemminki, Kari, Kumar, Rajiv, Hepworth, Sarah J, Price, Amy, Armstrong, Georgina, Liu, Yanhong, Gu, Xiangjun, Yu, Robert, Lau, Ching, Schoemaker, Minouk, Muir, Kenneth, Swerdlow, Anthony, Lathrop, Mark, Bondy, Melissa, Houlston, Richard S·2009·Nature Genetics

Abstract

To identify risk variants for glioma, we conducted a meta-analysis of two genome-wide association studies by genotyping 550K tagging SNPs in a total of 1,878 cases and 3,670 controls, with validation in three additional independent series totaling 2,545 cases and 2,953 controls. We identified five risk loci for glioma at 5p15.33 (rs2736100, TERT; P = 1.50 × 10−17), 8q24.21 (rs4295627, CCDC26; P = 2.34 × 10−18), 9p21.3 (rs4977756, CDKN2A-CDKN2B; P = 7.24 × 10−15), 20q13.33 (rs6010620, RTEL1; P = 2.52 × 10−12) and 11q23.3 (rs498872, PHLDB1; P = 1.07 × 10−8). These data show that common low-penetrance susceptibility alleles contribute to the risk of developing glioma and provide insight into disease causation of this primary brain tumor.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ng.407

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 788

Metadata

Authors
Shete, S., Hosking, F. J., Robertson, L. B., Dobbins, S. E., Sanson, M., Malmer, B., Simon, M., Marie, Y., Boisselier, B., Delattre, J.-Y., Hoang-Xuan, K., Hallani, S. E., Idbaih, A., Zelenika, D., Andersson, U., Henriksson, R., Bergenheim, A. T., Feychting, M., Lönn, S., Ahlbom, A., Schramm, J., Linnebank, M., Hemminki, K., Kumar, R., Hepworth, S. J., Price, A., Armstrong, G., Liu, Y., Gu, X., Yu, R., Lau, C., Schoemaker, M., Muir, K., Swerdlow, A., Lathrop, M., Bondy, M., & Houlston, R. S.
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2009-07-05
Volume
41
Issue
8
Pages
899-904
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2036307272
Cited by
788
References
9
FWCI
36.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genome-wide association study identifies five susceptibility loci for glioma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ng.407
The paper
Shete, S., Hosking, F. J., Robertson, L. B., Dobbins, S. E., Sanson, M., Malmer, B., Simon, M., Marie, Y., Boisselier, B., Delattre, J.-Y., Hoang-Xuan, K., Hallani, S. E., Idbaih, A., Zelenika, D., Andersson, U., Henriksson, R., Bergenheim, A. T., Feychting, M., Lönn, S., . . . Houlston, R. S. (2009). Genome-wide association study identifies five susceptibility loci for glioma. Nature Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.407

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.