The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Twenty bone-mineral-density loci identified by large-scale meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies
Open accessAbstract
Bone mineral density (BMD) is a heritable complex trait used in the clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis and the assessment of fracture risk. We performed meta-analysis of five genome-wide association studies of femoral neck and lumbar spine BMD in 19,195 subjects of Northern European descent. We identified 20 BMD loci that reached genome-wide significance (GWS; P < 5 × 10−8), of which 13 map to regions not previously associated with this trait: 1p31.3 (GPR177), 2p21 (SPTBN1), 3p22 (CTNNB1), 4q21.1 (MEPE), 5q14 (MEF2C), 7p14 (STARD3NL), 7q21.3 (FLJ42280), 11p11.2 (LRP4, ARHGAP1, F2), 11p14.1 (DCDC5), 11p15 (SOX6), 16q24 (FOXL1), 17q21 (HDAC5) and 17q12 (CRHR1). The meta-analysis also confirmed at GWS level seven known BMD loci on 1p36 (ZBTB40), 6q25 (ESR1), 8q24 (TNFRSF11B), 11q13.4 (LRP5), 12q13 (SP7), 13q14 (TNFSF11) and 18q21 (TNFRSF11A). The many SNPs associated with BMD map to genes in signaling pathways with relevance to bone metabolism and highlight the complex genetic architecture that underlies osteoporosis and variation in BMD.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses.
Purcell, S., Neale, B., Todd-Brown, K., Thomas, L., Ferreira, M. A. R., Bender, D., Maller, J., Sklar, P., de Bakker, P. I. W., Daly, M. J., et al. (2007) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/519795 · Cited by 34,089
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 · Cited by 10,505
Self-citationPrincipal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies
Price, A. L., Patterson, N. J., Plenge, R. M., Weinblatt, M. E., Shadick, N. A., & Reich, D. (2006) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1847 · Cited by 10,248
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · CHANCE · doi:10.1080/09332480.2005.10722754 · Cited by 4,702
Self-citationA second generation human haplotype map of over 3.1 million SNPs
The International HapMap Consortium (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06258 · Cited by 4,438
Genomic Control for Association Studies
Devlin, B., & Roeder, K. (1999) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.1999.00997.x · Cited by 3,162 · cited 1×
“Identification of BMD loci Association results (corrected by the genomic control metho”
Genome-wide association studies for complex traits: consensus, uncertainty and challenges
McCarthy, M. I., Abecasis, G. R., Cardon, L. R., Goldstein, D. B., Little, J., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Hirschhorn, J. N. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2344 · Cited by 2,891
Self-citationA new multipoint method for genome-wide association studies by imputation of genotypes
Marchini, J., Howie, B., Myers, S., McVean, G., & Donnelly, P. (2007) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng2088 · Cited by 2,609
GenABEL: an R library for genome-wide association analysis
Aulchenko, Y. S., Ripke, S., Isaacs, A., & van Duijn, C. M. (2007) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm108 · Cited by 1,836
Self-citationPractical aspects of imputation-driven meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies
de Bakker, P. I. W., Ferreira, M. A. R., Jia, X., Neale, B. M., Raychaudhuri, S., & Voight, B. F. (2008) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddn288 · Cited by 531 · cited 1×
“Overall meta-analysis genomic control inflation factors were calculated as describe”
Cited by
WNT signaling in bone homeostasis and disease: From human mutations to treatments
Baron, R., & Kneissel, M. (2013) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3074 · Cited by 2,093
Whole‐genome sequencing identifies EN1 as a determinant of bone density and fracture
Zheng, H., Forgetta, V., Hsu, Y., Estrada, K., Rosello‐Diez, A., Leo, P. J., Dahia, C. L., Park‐Min, K. H., Tobias, J. H., Kooperberg, C., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14878 · Cited by 601
Bone composition: relationship to bone fragility and antiosteoporotic drug effects
Boskey, A. L. (2013) · BoneKEy Reports · doi:10.1038/bonekey.2013.181 · Cited by 424
A road map for understanding molecular and genetic determinants of osteoporosis
Yang, T.-L., Shen, H., Liu, A., Dong, S.-S., Zhang, L., Deng, F.-Y., Zhao, Q., & Deng, H.-W. (2020) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/s41574-019-0282-7 · Cited by 341
Sex Steroid Actions in Male Bone
Vanderschueren, D., Laurent, M. R., Claessens, F., Gielen, E., Lagerquist, M. K., Vandenput, L., Börjesson, A. E., & Ohlsson, C. (2014) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2014-1024 · Cited by 327
Metadata
- Authors
- the Genetic Factors for Osteoporosis (GEFOS) Consortium
- Venue
- Nature Genetics
- Published
- 2009-10-04
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1199-1206
- ISSN
- 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1718
- OpenAlex
- W2037046278
- Cited by
- 706
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 14.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Twenty bone-mineral-density loci identified by large-scale meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ng.446
- The paper
- the Genetic Factors for Osteoporosis (GEFOS) Consortium. (2009). Twenty bone-mineral-density loci identified by large-scale meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies. Nature Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.446
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
