The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Subspecific origin and haplotype diversity in the laboratory mouse
Open accessAbstract
Here we provide a genome-wide, high-resolution map of the phylogenetic origin of the genome of most extant laboratory mouse inbred strains. Our analysis is based on the genotypes of wild-caught mice from three subspecies of Mus musculus. We show that classical laboratory strains are derived from a few fancy mice with limited haplotype diversity. Their genomes are overwhelmingly Mus musculus domesticus in origin, and the remainder is mostly of Japanese origin. We generated genome-wide haplotype maps based on identity by descent from fancy mice and show that classical inbred strains have limited and non-randomly distributed genetic diversity. In contrast, wild-derived laboratory strains represent a broad sampling of diversity within M. musculus. Intersubspecific introgression is pervasive in these strains, and contamination by laboratory stocks has played a role in this process. The subspecific origin, haplotype diversity and identity by descent maps can be visualized using the Mouse Phylogeny Viewer (see URLs).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome
Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01262 · Cited by 7,187
Blocks of Limited Haplotype Diversity Revealed by High-Resolution Scanning of Human Chromosome 21
Patil, N., Berno, A. J., Hinds, D. A., Barrett, W. A., Doshi, J. M., Hacker, C. R., Kautzer, C. R., Lee, D. H., Marjoribanks, C., McDonough, D. P., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1065573 · Cited by 1,145
Cited by
Wild Mouse Gut Microbiota Promotes Host Fitness and Improves Disease Resistance
Rosshart, S. P., Vassallo, B. G., Angeletti, D., Hutchinson, D. S., Morgan, A. P., Takeda, K., Hickman, H. D., McCulloch, J. A., Badger, J. H., Ajami, N. J., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.016 · Cited by 862
Worldwide Patterns of Ancestry, Divergence, and Admixture in Domesticated Cattle
Decker, J. E., McKay, S. D., Rolf, M. M., Kim, J., Molina Alcalá, A., Sonstegard, T. S., Hanotte, O., Götherström, A., Seabury, C. M., Praharani, L., et al. (2014) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004254 · Cited by 521
The Genome Architecture of the Collaborative Cross Mouse Genetic Reference Population
Collaborative Cross Consortium (2012) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.111.132639 · Cited by 480
Host genetic diversity enables Ebola hemorrhagic fever pathogenesis and resistance
Rasmussen, A. L., Okumura, A., Ferris, M. T., Green, R., Feldmann, F., Kelly, S. M., Scott, D. P., Safronetz, D., Haddock, E., LaCasse, R., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1259595 · Cited by 290
The Mouse Universal Genotyping Array: From Substrains to Subspecies
Morgan, A. P., Fu, C.-P., Kao, C.-Y., Welsh, C. E., Didion, J. P., Yadgary, L., Hyacinth, L., Ferris, M. T., Bell, T. A., Miller, D. R., et al. (2016) · G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.115.022087 · Cited by 214
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, H., Wang, J. R., Didion, J. P., Buus, R. J., Bell, T. A., Welsh, C. E., Bonhomme, F., Yu, A. H.-T., Nachman, M. W., Pialek, J., Tucker, P., Boursot, P., McMillan, L., Churchill, G. A., & de Villena, F. P.-M.
- Venue
- Nature Genetics
- Published
- 2011-05-29
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 648-655
- ISSN
- 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1718
- OpenAlex
- W2127783517
- Cited by
- 468
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 25.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
