The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Human mtDNA and Y-chromosome variation is correlated with matrilocal versus patrilocal residence.
Abstract
Genetic differences among human populations are usually larger for the Y chromosome than for mtDNA. One possible explanation is the higher rate of female versus male migration due to the widespread phenomenon of patrilocality, in which the woman moves to her mate's residence after marriage. To test this hypothesis, we compare mtDNA and Y-chromosome variation in three matrilocal (in which the man moves to his mate's residence after marriage) and three patrilocal groups among the hill tribes of northern Thailand. Genetic diversity in these groups shows a striking correlation with residence pattern, supporting the role of sex-specific migration in influencing human genetic variation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These studies have shown that in patrilocal populations, genetic differentiation is stronger among men than among women, while the reverse is observed in matrilocal populations.”
From Sex-Specific Genetic Structure and Social Organization in Central Asia: Insights from a Multi-Locus Study (2008) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“However, the influence of such processes on genetic structure has often been considered as negligible, since realistic rates of polygyny cannot create large differences in male and female genetic structure [3],[5],[14].”
From Sex-Specific Genetic Structure and Social Organization in Central Asia: Insights from a Multi-Locus Study (2008) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“While an influence of post-marital residence on the migration rate of women and men has already been widely proposed [14]–[17] (see also Table 1), the factors that may locally affect the effective number of women, relatively to that of men, are not well recognized.”
From Sex-Specific Genetic Structure and Social Organization in Central Asia: Insights from a Multi-Locus Study (2008) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“Our results, based on the X chromosome and the autosomes, also confirm previous analyses based on the mtDNA and the NRY, showing that men are genetically more structured than women in other patrilocal populations [3]–[10], [14]–[17]”
From Sex-Specific Genetic Structure and Social Organization in Central Asia: Insights from a Multi-Locus Study (2008) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“which would homogenize the mitochondrial gene pools of different groups41,42.”
From Cultural hitchhiking and competition between patrilineal kin groups explain the post-Neolithic Y-chromosome bottleneck (2018) · cites this paper as [41]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Seielstad, M.T., Minch, E. & Cavalli-Sfroza, L.L. Nature Genet. 20, 278–280 (1998). · DOI · Paper page
- Perez-Lezaun, A. et al. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 65, 208–219 (1999). · DOI · Paper page
- Jorde, L.B. et al. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 66, 979–988 (2000). · DOI
- Burton, M.L., Moore, C.C., Whiting, J.W.M. & Romney, A.K. Curr. Anthropol. 37, 87–123 (1996). · DOI · Paper page
- Kimura, M. et al. Hum. Biol. 70, 993–1000 (1998).
- Anderson, S. et al. Nature 290, 457–465 (1981). · DOI
- Burckhardt, F., von Haeseler, A. & Meyer, S. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 138–142 (1999). · DOI
- Nei, M. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics (Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 1987). · DOI
- Slatkin, M. Genetics 139, 457–462 (1995). · DOI
- Salem, A.H., Badr, F.M., Gaballah, M.F. & Pääbo, S. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 59, 741–743 (1996).
- Bamshad, M.J. et al. Nature 395, 651–652 (1998). · DOI
- Bamshad, M. et al. Genome Res. 11, 994–1004 (2001). · DOI
Cited by
Untangling Oceanic settlement: the edge of the knowable
Hurles, M. E., Matisoo-Smith, E., Gray, R. D., & Penny, D. (2003) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(03)00245-3 · Cited by 118
Zeng, T. C., Aw, A. J., & Feldman, M. W. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04375-6 · Cited by 121
Laval, G., Patin, E., Barreiro, L. B., & Quintana-Murci, L. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010284 · Cited by 93
Ségurel, L., Martínez-Cruz, B., Quintana-Murci, L., Balaresque, P., Georges, M., Hegay, T., Aldashev, A., Nasyrova, F., Jobling, M. A., Heyer, E., et al. (2008) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000200 · Cited by 95
Sex‐specific genetic diversity is shaped by cultural factors in Inner Asian human populations
Marchi, N., Hegay, T., Mennecier, P., Georges, M., Laurent, R., Whitten, M., Endicott, P., Aldashev, A., Dorzhu, C., Nasyrova, F., et al. (2017) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.23151 · Cited by 38
Guyon, L., Guez, J., Toupance, B., Heyer, E., & Chaix, R. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-47618-5 · Cited by 28
Munshi-South, J. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003228 · Cited by 20
Hrnčíř, V., Duda, P., Šaffa, G., Květina, P., & Zrzavý, J. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0229363 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Oota, H., Settheetham-Ishida, W., Tiwawech, D., Ishida, T., & Stoneking, M.
- Venue
- Nature Genetics
- Published
- 2001-08-20
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 20-21
- ISSN
- 1061-4036
- 1546-1718
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
