CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 156

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Importance of pre-impact crustal structure for the asymmetry of the Chicxulub impact crater

Gulick, Sean P. S., Barton, Penny J., Christeson, Gail L., Morgan, Joanna V., McDonald, Matthew, Mendoza-Cervantes, Keren, Pearson, Zulmacristina F., Surendra, Anusha, Urrutia-Fucugauchi, Jaime, Vermeesch, Peggy M., Warner, Mike R.·2008·Nature Geoscience
DOI 10.1038/ngeo103
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ngeo103

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Melosh, H. J. Impact Cratering: A Geologic Process (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1989).
  2. Schultz, P. H. & D’Hondt, S. Cretaceous-Tertiary (Chicxulub) impact angle and its consequences. Geology 24, 963–967 (1996). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Hildebrand, A. R. et al. Mapping Chicxulub crater structure with gravity and seismic reflection data. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Pub. 140, 177–193 (1998). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Alvarez, L. W., Alvarez, W., Azaro, F. & Michel, H. V. Extraterrestrial cause for the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction. Science 208, 1095–1108 (1980). · DOI
  5. Melosh, H. J., Schneider, N. M., Zahnle, K. J. & Latham, D. Ignition of global wildfires at the K/T boundary. Nature 343, 251–254 (1990). · DOI
  6. MacLeod, K. G., Whitney, D. L., Huber, B. T. & Koeberl, C. Impact and extinction in remarkably complete Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary sections from Demerara Rise, tropical western North Atlantic. GSA Bull. 119, 101–115 (2007). · DOI
  7. Pierazzo, E., Kring, D. A. & Melosh, H. J. Hydrocode simulation of the Chicxulub impact event and the production of climatically active gases. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 28607–28625 (1998). · DOI
  8. Pope, K. O., Baines, K. H., Ocampo, A. & Ivanov, B. A. Energy, volatile production, and climatic effects of the Chicxulub Cretaceous/Tertiary impact. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 21645–21664 (1997). · DOI
  9. Ivanov, B. A. et al. Degassing of sedimentary rocks due to Chicxulub impact: Hydrocode and physical simulations. Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap. 307, 125–140 (1996).
  10. Kring, D. A. & Durda, D. D. Trajectories and distribution of material ejected from the Chicxulub impact crater: Implications for postimpact wildfires. J. Geophys. Res. 107 (2002) (doi:10.1029/2001JE001532). · DOI
  11. Pierazzo, E. Assessing atmospheric water injection from oceanic impacts. Lunar Planet. Sci. XXXVI, 1987 (2005).
  12. Hildebrand, A. R. et al. A possible Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary impact crater on the Yucatan peninsula, Mexico. Geology 19, 867–871 (1991). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Schultz, P. H. Effect of impact angle on vaporization. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 21117–21136 (1996). · DOI
  14. Pierazzo, E. & Melosh, H. J. Hydrocode modelling of Chicxulub as an oblique impact event. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 165, 163–176 (1999). · DOI
  15. Pierazzo, E. & Melosh, H. J. Hydrocode modelling of oblique impacts: The fate of the projectile. Meteor. Planet. Sci. 35, 117–130 (2000). · DOI
  16. Sharpton, V. L. et al. Model of the Chicxulub impact basin. Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap. 307, 55–74 (1996).
  17. Morgan, J. et al. Size and morphology of the Chicxulub impact crater. Nature 390, 472–476 (1997). · DOI · Paper page
  18. Morgan, J. & Warner, M. Chicxulub: The third dimension of a multi-ring basin. Geology 27, 407–410 (1999). · DOI · Paper page
  19. Morgan, J. V. et al. Peak-ring formation in large impact craters: Geophysical constraints from Chicxulub. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 183, 347–354 (2000). · DOI · Paper page
  20. Gault, D. E. & Wedekind, J. A. Experimental studies of oblique impact. Proc. Lunar Planet. Conf. 9, 3843–3875 (1978).
  21. Morgan, J. et al. Chicxulub crater seismic survey prepares way for future drilling. Eos Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 86, 325–328 (2005). · DOI
  22. Ames, D. E., Jonasson, I. R., Gibson, H. L. & Pope, K. O. Impact-generated hydrothermal system: Constraints from the large Paleoproterozoic Sudbury crater. Can. Geol. Surv. Canada Contr. Ser. 2003306, 55–100 (2006).
  23. Pope, K. O., Ocampo, A. C., Kinsland, G. L. & Smith, R. Surface expression of the Chicxulub crater. Geology 24, 527–530 (1996). · DOI · Paper page
  24. Camargo-Zanoguera, A. & Suarez-Reynoso, G. Evidencia Sismica del crater impacto de Chicxulub. G. Bol. Asoc. Mex. Geof. Expl. 34, 1–28 (1994).
  25. Christeson, G. L., Nakamura, Y., Bufler, R. T., Morgan, J. & Warner, M. Deep crustal structure of the Chicxulub impact crater. J. Geophys. Res. 106, 21751–21769 (2001). · DOI
  26. Warner, M. et al. High-resolution images of the lower crust: Deep seismic reflections from 15–180 Hz. Tectonophysics 232, 225–237 (1994). · DOI
  27. Lana, C., Gibson, R. & Reimold, W. U. Impact tectonics in the core of the Vredefort Dome; implications for central uplift formation. Meteor. Planet. Sci. 38, 1093–1108 (2003). · DOI · Paper page
  28. Gifford, A. W. & Maxwell, T. A. Asymmetric terracing of lunar highlands craters: Influence of pre-impact topography and structure. Proc. Lunar Planet. Conf. 10, 2597–2607 (1979).
  29. Gifford, A. W., Maxwell, T. A. & El-Baz, F. Geology of the lunar farside crater Necho. Moon Planets 21, 25–42 (1979). · DOI
  30. Vermeesch, P. M. Geophysical Study of the Chicxulub Impact Crater. Thesis, Imperial College London, UK, 418 p (2006).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 156

Metadata

Authors
Gulick, S. P. S., Barton, P. J., Christeson, G. L., Morgan, J. V., McDonald, M., Mendoza-Cervantes, K., Pearson, Z. F., Surendra, A., Urrutia-Fucugauchi, J., Vermeesch, P. M., & Warner, M. R.
Venue
Nature Geoscience
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2008-01-13
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
131-135
ISSN
  • 1752-0894
  • 1752-0908
DOI
10.1038/ngeo103
Cited by
156
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review