Cited by 162Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesSpace Science and Extraterrestrial LifeAstro and Planetary Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Water contents of Earth-mass planets around M dwarfs

Tian, Feng, Ida, Shigeru·2015·Nature Geoscience

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ngeo2372

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–158 of 158

Metadata

Authors
Tian, F., & Ida, S.
Affiliations
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • Tokyo Institute of Technology (JP)
Corresponding author
Tian, Feng
Venue
Nature Geoscience
Published
2015-02-16
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
177-180
ISSN
  • 1752-0894 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-0908
OpenAlex
W2035144479
Cited by
162
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14
FWCI
10.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nature Geoscience (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Astro and Planetary Science
Keywords
M dwarfs, habitable planets, moisture content, Earth-mass planets, water loss, hydrodynamic escape, planet population synthesis, ocean planets, habitability, G dwarfs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review