Cited by 251T-cell and B-cell ImmunologyImmunotherapy and Immune Responsesvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches

An endogenous positively selecting peptide enhances mature T cell responses and becomes an autoantigen in the absence of microRNA miR-181a

Open access
Ebert, Peter J R, Jiang, Shan, Xie, Jianming, Li, Qi-Jing, Davis, Mark M·2009·Nature Immunology

Abstract

Thymic positive selection is based on the interactions of T cell antigen receptors (TCRs) with self peptide-major histocompatibility complex (MHC) ligands, but the identity of selecting peptides for MHC class II-restricted TCRs and the functional consequences of this peptide specificity are not clear. Here we identify several endogenous self peptides that positively selected the MHC class II-restricted 5C.C7 TCR. The most potent of these also enhanced mature T cell activation, which supports the hypothesis that one function of positive selection is to produce T cells that can use particular self peptide-MHC complexes for activation and/or homeostasis. We also show that inhibiting the microRNA miR-181a resulted in maturation of T cells that overtly reacted toward these erstwhile positively selecting peptides. Therefore, miR-181a helps to guarantee the clonal deletion of particular moderate-affinity clones by modulating the TCR signaling threshold of thymocytes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ni.1797

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Endogenous retroviral antigens do not cause complete immunological tolerance and both T and B cell responses are frequently detected in both mice and humans.

    “It is also clear, however, that endogenous retroviral antigens do not cause complete immunological tolerance and both T and B cell responses are frequently detected in both mice and humans 33,34,36–41.”

    From Are human endogenous retroviruses pathogenic? An approach to testing the hypothesis (2013) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Results (Self peptides that positively select the 5C.C7 TCR; page unavailable) identify GP peptide as partly derived from endogenous retroviral sequences. The Results (Central tolerance requires miR-181a; page unavailable) report a few GP-reactive T cells in control mouse thymic cultures and more after miR-181a inhibition, supporting incomplete T-cell tolerance in this model. The paper does not establish that T- and B-cell responses to endogenous retroviral antigens are frequently detected in both mice and humans. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • When the mechanisms that regulate TCR signaling threshold of thymocytes fail, the same ERV-encoded self-antigen induced an autoimmune response.

    “However, when the mechanisms that regulate TCR signaling threshold of thymocytes fail, the same ERV-encoded self-antigen induced an autoimmune response 33.”
  • Mouse studies have revealed that ERV-encoded self-antigens can, in certain cases, mediate positive selection of developing thymocytes with specific T cell receptor (TCR) reactivity, and promote their peripheral response to cognate antigen.

    “Mouse studies have revealed that ERV-encoded self-antigens can, in certain cases, mediate positive selection of developing thymocytes with specific T cell receptor (TCR) reactivity, and promote their peripheral response to cognate antigen 33,34.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ebert, P. J. R., Jiang, S., Xie, J., Li, Q.-J., & Davis, M. M.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Li, Qi-Jing
  • Davis, Mark M
Venue
Nature Immunology
Published
2009-10-04
Volume
10
Issue
11
Pages
1162-1169
ISSN
  • 1529-2908 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2916
OpenAlex
W2103780522
Cited by
251
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 25
FWCI
9.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI022511, R01AI073724, R37AI022511)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Keywords
thymic positive selection, autoantigens, miR-181a, microRNA, T cell activation, T cell homeostasis, clonal deletion, thymocytes
MeSH terms
Animals, Histocompatibility Antigens Class II, Cells, Cultured, Gene Expression Regulation, Lymphocyte Activation, Peptides, Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, T-Lymphocytes, Thymus Gland, Clonal Deletion, Mice, Knockout, MicroRNAs, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review