Cited by 308Treatment of Major DepressionMicroRNA in disease regulationNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

miR-1202 is a primate-specific and brain-enriched microRNA involved in major depression and antidepressant treatment

Open access
Lopez, Juan Pablo, Lim, Raymond, Cruceanu, Cristiana, Crapper, Liam, Fasano, Caroline, Labonte, Benoit, Maussion, Gilles, Yang, Jennie P +6 more·2014·Nature Medicine

Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a prevalent mood disorder that is associated with differential prefrontal brain expression patterns. Treatment of MDD includes a variety of biopsychosocial approaches. In medical practice, antidepressant drugs are the most common treatment for depressive episodes, and they are among the most prescribed medications in North America. Although antidepressants are clearly effective, particularly for moderate to severe depressive episodes, there is variability in how individuals respond to antidepressant treatment. Failure to respond has individual, economic and social consequences for patients and their families. Several lines of evidence demonstrate that genes are regulated through the activity of microRNAs (miRNAs), which act as fine-tuners and on-off switches of gene expression. Here we report on complementary studies using postmortem human brain samples, cellular assays and samples from clinical trials of patients with depression and show that miR-1202, a miRNA specific to primates and enriched in the human brain, is differentially expressed in individuals with depression. Additionally, miR-1202 regulates expression of the gene encoding metabotropic glutamate receptor-4 (GRM4) and predicts antidepressant response at baseline. These results suggest that miR-1202 is associated with the pathophysiology of depression and is a potential target for new antidepressant treatments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nm.3582

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Upon antidepressant treatment, peripheral levels of miR-1202 increased after 8 weeks of treatment.

    “Additionally, upon antidepressant treatment, peripheral levels of miR-1202 increased after 8 weeks of treatment”

    From Epigenetics and depression (2019) · cites this paper as [30]

    The passage on blood miR-1202 levels (labeled Abstract in our copy) reports an increase after eight weeks of citalopram treatment in patients whose depression remitted. It reports no such change in nonresponders, so the unqualified claim overgeneralizes the finding. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • miR-1202, a miRNA regulating GRM4, was downregulated in the prefrontal cortex of MDD patients who died by suicide compared with psychiatrically healthy controls.

    “miR-1202, a miRNA regulating a glutamate receptor ( GRM4 ) was found to be downregulated in PFC of MDD patients who died by suicide compared with psychiatrically healthy controls.”

    From Epigenetics and depression (2019) · cites this paper as [30]

    The passage on the independent PFC sample (indexed under Abstract; page unavailable) reports lower miR-1202 in depressed subjects than controls, and the paper states that miR-1202 regulates GRM4. The Methods > Human Samples passage (page unavailable) describes postmortem cases and controls but does not establish that the depressed subjects in that comparison all died by suicide. The suicide qualifier is therefore not supported for the reported comparison. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • miR-335, miR-1202, miR-29b-3p, and miR-134-5p may regulate depression through inhibiting GRM4 expression, affecting Ca2+ influx into prefrontal cortex neurons and extracellular glutamate concentration.

    “MiR-335, miR-1202, miR-29b-3p, and miR-134-5p may regulate depression through inhibiting the expression of GRM4 gene (Fig. 5), that in turn affect the influx of Ca2+ into the prefrontal cortex neurons and the extracellular concentration of glutamate.277–283”

    From Epigenetic regulation in major depression and other stress-related disorders: molecular mechanisms, clinical relevance and therapeutic potential (2023) · cites this paper as [281]

    The paper’s main text (indexed under Abstract; no page number available) reports that miR-1202 reduces GRM4 expression in a cell experiment and that their expression is inversely correlated in prefrontal cortex tissue from depressed individuals. It does not establish GRM4 inhibition by the other three named miRNAs or the proposed effects on neuronal Ca2+ influx and extracellular glutamate concentration. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Higher miR-1202 levels in MDD patients are reported following eight weeks of citalopram, but no differences in controls.

    “Higher miR-1202 levels in MDD patients are reported following eight weeks of citalopram, but no differences in controls.281”

    From Epigenetic regulation in major depression and other stress-related disorders: molecular mechanisms, clinical relevance and therapeutic potential (2023) · cites this paper as [281]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • mRNA levels of GRM4 increased in both cohorts.

    “Correspondingly, mRNA levels of GRM4 increased in both cohorts.”

    From Epigenetics and depression (2019) · cites this paper as [30]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 308

Authors
Lopez, J. P., Lim, R., Cruceanu, C., Crapper, L., Fasano, C., Labonte, B., Maussion, G., Yang, J. P., Yerko, V., Vigneault, E., El Mestikawy, S., Mechawar, N., Pavlidis, P., & Turecki, G.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
Corresponding author
Turecki, Gustavo
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2014-06-08
Volume
20
Issue
7
Pages
764-768
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W2085788459
Cited by
308
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 8
FWCI
25.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Fondation Brain Canada
  • Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (93775_2, 111260_1, 93775_1)
  • Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › MicroRNA in disease regulation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
microRNA, major depressive disorder, antidepressant response, antidepressant resistance, mGluR4, postmortem brain, gene expression regulation, depression pathophysiology, antidepressant targets
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Brain, Cell Line, Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, MicroRNAs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review