Cited by 13Epigenetics and DNA MethylationCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

The epigenome editors: How tools such as CRISPR offer new details about epigenetics

Willyard, Cassandra·2017·Nature Medicine

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nm0817-900

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Viral transduction for Cas9/sgRNA delivery in cell culture may cause accumulation of off-target mutations.

    “| Delivery methods improvement | Application in cell culture [89–94] | Viral transduction | May cause accumulation of off-target mutations |”

    From Off-target effects in CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing (2023) · cites this paper as [91]

  • Plasmid transfection for Cas9/sgRNA delivery in cell culture may cause accumulation of off-target mutations.

    “| Delivery methods improvement | Application in cell culture [89–94] | Plasmid transfection | May cause accumulation of off-target mutations |”

    From Off-target effects in CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing (2023) · cites this paper as [91]

  • RNP electroporation for Cas9/sgRNA delivery in cell culture eliminates off-target effects.

    “| Delivery methods improvement | Application in cell culture [89–94] | RNP electroporation: Rapid transfection and turnover | Eliminate off-target effects |”

    From Off-target effects in CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing (2023) · cites this paper as [91]

  • Epigenetic editors could potentially exert off-target effects at the epigenome level.

    “However, epigenetic editors could potentially exert off-target effects at the epigenome level”

    From Off-target effects in CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing (2023) · cites this paper as Willyard, 2017

  • Epigenetic editors utilize enzymatically dead Cas9 (dCas9) to direct epigenetic modulation on targeted genes, thereby altering their endogenous expression level.

    “These tools utilize enzymatically dead Cas9 (dCas9) to direct epigenetic modulation on targeted genes, thereby altering their endogenous expression level.”

    From Off-target effects in CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing (2023) · cites this paper as Willyard, 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Willyard, C.
Corresponding author
Willyard, Cassandra
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2017-08
Volume
23
Issue
8
Pages
900-903
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W2744615298
Cited by
13
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
epigenetics, epigenome editing, CRISPR, DNA methylation, transcriptional regulation, Id2, Id4
MeSH terms
Gene Editing, Humans, Epigenomics, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review