Erratum: Corrigendum: Resolving controversies on the path to Alzheimer's therapeutics
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Cites
Resolving controversies on the path to Alzheimer's therapeutics
Selkoe, D. J. (2011) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.2460 · Cited by 494 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nelson, P. T., Alafuzoff, I., Bigio, E. H., Bouras, C., Braak, H., Cairns, N. J., Castellani, R. J., Crain, B. J., Davies, P., Tredici, K. D., et al. (2012) · Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1097/nen.0b013e31825018f7 · Cited by 2,050 · see citing works
- Authors
- Selkoe, D. J.
- Corresponding author
- Selkoe, Dennis J
- ORCID
- Selkoe, Dennis J
- Venue
- Nature Medicine
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1521-1521
- ISSN
- 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-170X
- OpenAlex
- W4241725177
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Medicine (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, bapineuzumab, amyloid-beta antibodies, drug development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
