Cited by 494Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases

Resolving controversies on the path to Alzheimer's therapeutics

Selkoe, Dennis J·2011·Nature Medicine

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease constitutes a personal and societal tragedy of immense proportions. Since 1960, research in laboratories and clinics worldwide has elucidated many features of this insidious and ultimately fatal syndrome, and this progress has led to initial human trials of potentially disease-modifying agents. However, some of these agents have already failed. Gnawing controversies and important gaps in our knowledge seem to cast additional doubt on the ability of the field to move forward effectively. Here I discuss some of these looming concerns and offer possible explanations for the major trial failures that suggest they are not predictive of the future. Rigorous preclinical validation of mechanism-based therapeutic agents followed by meticulously designed trials that focus on the cardinal cognitive symptoms and their associated biomarkers in the mild or presymptomatic phases of Alzheimer's disease are likely to lead to success, perhaps in the not-too-distant future.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nm.2460

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Selkoe, D. J.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Selkoe, Dennis J
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2011-09
Volume
17
Issue
9
Pages
1060-1065
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W2084121214
Cited by
494
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 73
FWCI
45.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, disease-modifying therapy, clinical trial failure, preclinical validation, biomarkers, preclinical Alzheimer's disease, cognitive symptoms, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Clinical Trials as Topic, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Humans, Research Design, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Plaque, Amyloid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review