Cited by 572Advanced Photocatalysis TechniquesIron oxide chemistry and applicationsElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion

Photoelectrochemical water splitting in separate oxygen and hydrogen cells

Open access
Landman, Avigail, Dotan, Hen, Shter, Gennady E., Wullenkord, Michael, Houaijia, Anis, Maljusch, Artjom, Grader, Gideon S., Rothschild, Avner·2017·Nature Materials

Abstract

Solar water splitting provides a promising path for sustainable hydrogen production and solar energy storage. One of the greatest challenges towards large-scale utilization of this technology is reducing the hydrogen production cost. The conventional electrolyser architecture, where hydrogen and oxygen are co-produced in the same cell, gives rise to critical challenges in photoelectrochemical water splitting cells that directly convert solar energy and water to hydrogen. Here we overcome these challenges by separating the hydrogen and oxygen cells. The ion exchange in our cells is mediated by auxiliary electrodes, and the cells are connected to each other only by metal wires, enabling centralized hydrogen production. We demonstrate hydrogen generation in separate cells with solar-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency of 7.5%, which can readily surpass 10% using standard commercial components. A basic cost comparison shows that our approach is competitive with conventional photoelectrochemical systems, enabling safe and potentially affordable solar hydrogen production.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nmat4876

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Water electrolysis still necessitates a continuous input of high-purity electrolyte and an external power supply to maintain the system.

    “water electrolysis still necessitates a continuous input of high-purity electrolyte and an external power supply to maintain the system.[29,36]”

    From Advances in Blue Energy Fuels: Harvesting Energy from Ocean for Self‐Powered Electrolysis (2025) · cites this paper as [36]

    The Methods section says the tested cells used 1 M NaOH in deionized water and connected the primary electrodes to a power source. It does not say that a continuous input of high-purity electrolyte is necessary. The Methods also describe a solar-powered test with no additional external bias, so the claim that an external power supply is always required overstates the paper. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [5]5. A. Ursua, L. M. Gandia, P. Sanchis, Hydrogen Production from Water Electrolysis: Current Status and Future Trends. Proc. IEEE . 100 , 410-426 (2012).
  2. [10]10. J. Mcbreen, in Handbook of battery materials , C. Daniel, J. O. Besenhard, Eds. (WileyVCH Verlag GmbH & Co, Weinheim, Germany, 2nd edn., 2011), pp. 149-168.
  3. [11]11. P. Oliva, J. F. Laurent, J. Leonardi, Review of the structure and the electrochemistry of - nickel hydroxides and oxy-hydroxides. J. Power Sources . 8 , 229-255 (1982).
  4. [21]21. J. Newman, P. G. Hoertz, C. A. Bonino, J. A. Trainham, Review: an economic perspective on liquid solar fuels. J. Electrochem. Soc. 159 , A1722--A1729 (2012). - 19
  5. [24]24. IXOLAR High Efficiency SolarMD Data Sheet, http://ixapps.ixys.com/DataSheet/SLMD121H04L-DATA-SHEET.pdf (2012), pp. 1-6.
  6. [27]27. C. R. Cox, J. Z. Lee, D. G. Nocera, T. Buonassisi, Ten-percent solar-to-fuel conversion with nonprecious materials. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111 , 14057-14061 (2014).
  7. [34]34. K. D. Malviya, H. Dotan, K. R. Yoon, I.-D. Kima, A. Rothschild, Rigorous substrate cleaning process for reproducible thin film hematite (α-Fe2O3) photoanodes. J. Mater. Res. 31 , 1565-1573 (2016). Acknowledgments The research leading to these results has received funding from the Solar Fuels I-CORE program of the Planning and Budgeting Committee and the Israel Science Foundation (Grant No. 152/11), from the Israeli Ministry of National Infrastructure, Energy and Water Resources, and from Europe's Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking (FCH-JU) under Grant Agreement n. [621252]. The results were obtained using central facilities at the Technion's Hydrogen Technologies Research Laboratory (HTRL), supported by the Nancy and Stephen Grand Technion Energy Program (GTEP) and the Adelis Foundation. A. R. acknowledges support for developing photoelectrodes and PEC-PV tandem cells for solar water splitting from the European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007-2013) / ERC Grant Agreement n. [617516]. G. E. S. acknowledges support from the Committee for Planning and Budgeting of the Council for Higher Education under the framework of the KAMEA Program. G. S. G. acknowledges support from the Arturo Gruenbaum Chair in Material Engineering. The authors thank Yeshayahu Lifshitz and Scott C. Warren for reading the manuscript and providing useful suggestions for improving it. Author Contributions A.R. and G.G. conceived and guided the entire project. A.L., H.D. and G.S. designed the experiments. A.L. and H.D. performed the experiments and analyzed the data. All authors contributed to the cost analysis. A.R., G.G. and A.L. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript. Author Information Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints. The authors declare no competing financial interests. Readers are welcome to comment on the online version of the paper. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to A.R. (avner@mt.technion.ac.il) and G.G. (grader@technion.ac.il).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Landman, A., Dotan, H., Shter, G. E., Wullenkord, M., Houaijia, A., Maljusch, A., Grader, G. S., & Rothschild, A.
Affiliations
  • Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
  • Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
  • Evonik (Germany) (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Grader, Gideon S.
  • Rothschild, Avner
Venue
Nature Materials
Published
2017-03-13
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
646-651
ISSN
  • 1476-1122 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4660
OpenAlex
W2595002228
Cited by
572
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 13
FWCI
13.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • elib (German Aerospace Center) (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Iron oxide chemistry and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Keywords
photoelectrochemical water splitting, solar hydrogen production, auxiliary electrode, ion exchange, solar-to-hydrogen efficiency, hydrogen production cost, solar energy storage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review