The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High-throughput ethomics in large groups of Drosophila
Open accessAbstract
We present a camera-based method for automatically quantifying the individual and social behaviors of fruit flies, Drosophila melanogaster, interacting in a planar arena. Our system includes machine-vision algorithms that accurately track many individuals without swapping identities and classification algorithms that detect behaviors. The data may be represented as an ethogram that plots the time course of behaviors exhibited by each fly or as a vector that concisely captures the statistical properties of all behaviors displayed in a given period. We found that behavioral differences between individuals were consistent over time and were sufficient to accurately predict gender and genotype. In addition, we found that the relative positions of flies during social interactions vary according to gender, genotype and social environment. We expect that our software, which permits high-throughput screening, will complement existing molecular methods available in Drosophila, facilitating new investigations into the genetic and cellular basis of behavior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Automated monitoring and analysis of social behavior in Drosophila
Dankert, H., Wang, L., Hoopfer, E. D., Anderson, D. J., & Perona, P. (2009) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1310 · Cited by 382
Self-citation
Cited by
Neurons for hunger and thirst transmit a negative-valence teaching signal
Betley, J. N., Xu, S., Cao, Z. F. H., Gong, R., Magnus, C. J., Yu, Y., & Sternson, S. M. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14416 · Cited by 704
A framework for studying emotions across species
Anderson, D. J., & Adolphs, R. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.003 · Cited by 691
JAABA: Interactive machine learning for automatic annotation of animal behavior
Kabra, M., Robie, A. A., Rivera-Alba, M., Branson, S., & Branson, K. (2013) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2281 · Cited by 644
Self-citationMapping the stereotyped behaviour of freely moving fruit flies
Berman, G. J., Choi, D. M., Bialek, W., & Shaevitz, J. W. (2014) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2014.0672 · Cited by 565
Automated image-based tracking and its application in ecology
Dell, A. I., Bender, J. A., Branson, K., Couzin, I. D., de Polavieja, G. G., Noldus, L. P. J. J., Pérez-Escudero, A., Perona, P., Straw, A. D., Wikelski, M., et al. (2014) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2014.05.004 · Cited by 492
Metadata
- Authors
- Branson, K., Robie, A. A., Bender, J., Perona, P., & Dickinson, M. H.
- Venue
- Nature Methods
- Published
- 2009-05-03
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 451-457
- ISSN
- 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-7105
- OpenAlex
- W2135563396
- Cited by
- 786
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-throughput ethomics in large groups of Drosophila. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nmeth.1328
- The paper
- Branson, K., Robie, A. A., Bender, J., Perona, P., & Dickinson, M. H. (2009). High-throughput ethomics in large groups of Drosophila. Nature Methods. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1328
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
