Cited by 644Human Pose and Action RecognitionCell Image Analysis TechniquesNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research

JAABA: Interactive machine learning for automatic annotation of animal behavior

Open access
Kabra, Mayank, Robie, Alice A, Rivera-Alba, Marta, Branson, Steven, Branson, Kristin·2013·Nature Methods

Abstract

We present a machine learning-based system for automatically computing interpretable, quantitative measures of animal behavior. Through our interactive system, users encode their intuition about behavior by annotating a small set of video frames. These manual labels are converted into classifiers that can automatically annotate behaviors in screen-scale data sets. Our general-purpose system can create a variety of accurate individual and social behavior classifiers for different organisms, including mice and adult and larval Drosophila.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nmeth.2281

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Machine learning can tackle a wide range of tasks, including classifying observations into predefined sets, clustering data into groups that share an underlying process, and regressing an outcome against multiple factors and elucidating their contributory effect.

    “ML can tackle a wide range of tasks, including classifying observations into predefined sets (Kabra, Robie, Rivera-Alba, Branson, & Branson, 2013), clustering data into groups that share an underlying process (Zhang, O'Reilly, Perry, Taylor, & Dennis, 2015) and regressing an outcome of interest against multiple factors and elucidating their contributory effect (Chesler, Wilson, Lariviere, Rodrig”

    From Applications of machine learning in animal behaviour studies (2017) · cites this paper as Kabra et al., 2013

  • Machine learning is used to automate the classification of behaviours or activities and tracking movement trajectories from GPS, accelerometer and/or video data.

    “ML is used to automate the classification of behaviours/activities (Kabra et al., 2013) and tracking movement trajectories (Dell et al., 2014).”

    From Applications of machine learning in animal behaviour studies (2017) · cites this paper as Kabra et al., 2013

  • Machine learning can address different objectives in numerous distinct fields of animal behaviour and is becoming a staple approach for novel methods.

    “It is clear that ML can address different objectives in numerous distinct fields of animal behaviour and is thus becoming a staple approach for novel methods (Dankert, Wang, Hoopfer, Anderson, & Perona, 2009;Kabra et al., 2013).”

    From Applications of machine learning in animal behaviour studies (2017) · cites this paper as Kabra et al., 2013

  • A Janelia Automatic Animal Behavior Annotator classifier was used to quantify self-grooming.

    “A Janelia Automatic Animal Behavior Annotator classifier42 was used to quantify self‐grooming (see Ref. 43).”
  • JAABA provides unbiased computer identification of behaviors.

    “sent to JAABA (https://github.com/kristinbranson/JAABA; Kabra et al., 2013) Janelia Automatic Animal Behavior Annotator (RRID:SCR_027430) for unbiased computer identification of behaviors.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kabra, M., Robie, A. A., Rivera-Alba, M., Branson, S., & Branson, K.
Affiliations
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Branson, Kristin
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2013-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
64-67
ISSN
  • 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7105
OpenAlex
W1977591411
Cited by
644
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 11
FWCI
19.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Keywords
behavior classification, interactive machine learning, video annotation, behavioral tracking, mouse behavior, Drosophila behavior, larval Drosophila, social behavior, open source software
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Artificial Intelligence, Behavior, Animal, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Drosophila melanogaster, Larva, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review