The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Data-driven hypothesis weighting increases detection power in genome-scale multiple testing
Open accessAbstract
Hypothesis weighting improves the power of large-scale multiple testing. We describe independent hypothesis weighting (IHW), a method that assigns weights using covariates independent of the P-values under the null hypothesis but informative of each test's power or prior probability of the null hypothesis (http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/IHW). IHW increases power while controlling the false discovery rate and is a practical approach to discovering associations in genomics, high-throughput biology and other large data sets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482
Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2
Love, M. I., Huber, W., & Anders, S. (2014) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 · Cited by 95,106
Self-citationThe control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency
Benjamini, Y., & Yekutieli, D. (2001) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1013699998 · Cited by 10,490
Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate
Benjamini, Y., Krieger, A. M., & Yekutieli, D. (2006) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/93.3.491 · Cited by 3,228
Storey, J. D., Taylor, J. E., & Siegmund, D. (2004) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2004.00439.x · Cited by 1,388
False discovery rates: a new deal
Stephens, M. (2016) · Biostatistics · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxw041 · Cited by 1,067
Large-Scale Inference: Empirical Bayes Methods for Estimation, Testing, and Prediction
Efron, B. (2010) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511761362 · Cited by 813
Independent filtering increases detection power for high-throughput experiments
Bourgon, R., Gentleman, R., & Huber, W. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0914005107 · Cited by 740
Self-citationA unified approach to false discovery rate estimation
Strimmer, K. (2008) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-303 · Cited by 406
False discovery control with p-value weighting
Genovese, C. R., Roeder, K., & Wasserman, L. (2006) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/93.3.509 · Cited by 320
Genetic Control of Chromatin States in Humans Involves Local and Distal Chromosomal Interactions
Grubert, F., Zaugg, J. B., Kasowski, M., Ursu, O., Spacek, D. V., Martin, A. R., Greenside, P., Srivas, R., Phanstiel, D. H., Pekowska, A., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.048 · Cited by 319 · cited 1×
“In a third example, we searched for associations between SNPs and histone modification marks (H3K27ac) [16] on human Chromosome 21.”
BackgroundEvaluating Gene Expression in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J Mouse Striatum Using RNA-Seq and Microarrays
Bottomly, D., Walter, N. A. R., Hunter, J. E., Darakjian, P., Kawane, S., Buck, K. J., Searles, R. P., Mooney, M., McWeeney, S. K., & Hitzemann, R. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017820 · Cited by 232
False Discovery Rate Control With Groups
Hu, J. X., Zhao, H., & Zhou, H. H. (2010) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2010.tm09329 · Cited by 178
ReCount: A multi-experiment resource of analysis-ready RNA-seq gene count datasets
Frazee, A. C., Langmead, B., & Leek, J. T. (2011) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-449 · Cited by 160
Dephoure, N., & Gygi, S. P. (2012) · Science Signaling · doi:10.1126/scisignal.2002548 · Cited by 153
Simultaneous Testing of Grouped Hypotheses: Finding Needles in Multiple Haystacks
Cai, T., & Sun, W. (2009) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2009.tm08415 · Cited by 126
Improving power in genome‐wide association studies: weights tip the scale
Roeder, K., Devlin, B., & Wasserman, L. (2007) · Genetic Epidemiology · doi:10.1002/gepi.20237 · Cited by 93
Scott, J. G., Kelly, R. C., Smith, M. A., Zhou, P., & Kass, R. E. (2015) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2014.990973 · Cited by 79
Multidimensional local false discovery rate for microarray studies
Ploner, A., Calza, S., Gusnanto, A., & Yudi Pawitan, Y. (2005) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btk013 · Cited by 78
Optimal weighting for false discovery rate control
Roquain, É., & van de Wiel, M. A. (2009) · Electronic Journal of Statistics · doi:10.1214/09-ejs430 · Cited by 60
Power-Enhanced Multiple Decision Functions Controlling Family-Wise Error and False Discovery RatesPreprint
Peña, E. A., Habiger, J., & Wu, W. (2009) · Cited by 45
Power-enhanced multiple decision functions controlling family-wise error and false discovery rates
Peña, E. A., Habiger, J. D., & Wu, W. (2011) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/10-aos844 · Cited by 35
SINGLE-INDEX MODULATED MULTIPLE TESTINGPreprint
Du, L., & Zhang, C. (2016) · Cited by 28
Beyond the E-Value: Stratified Statistics for Protein Domain Prediction
Ochoa, A., Storey, J. D., Llinás, M., & Singh, M. (2015) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004509 · Cited by 27
Yoo, Y. J., Bull, S. B., Paterson, A. D., Waggott, D. M., & Sun, L. (2009) · Genetic Epidemiology · doi:10.1002/gepi.20438 · Cited by 26
Single-index modulated multiple testing
Du, L., & Zhang, C. (2014) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/14-aos1222 · Cited by 25
Optimal multiple testing under a Gaussian prior on the effect sizes
Dobriban, E., Fortney, K., Kim, S. K., & Owen, A. B. (2015) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/asv050 · Cited by 24
False discovery rates and copy number variation
Efron, B., & Zhang, N. R. (2011) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/asr018 · Cited by 22
Cited by
Zhu, A., Ibrahim, J. G., & Love, M. I. (2019) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty895 · Cited by 2,072
Universal Patterns of Selection in Cancer and Somatic Tissues
Martincorena, I., Raine, K. M., Gerstung, M., Dawson, K. J., Haase, K., Van Loo, P., Davies, H., Stratton, M. R., & Campbell, P. J. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.042 · Cited by 1,523
Leveraging Polygenic Functional Enrichment to Improve GWAS Power
Kichaev, G., Bhatia, G., Loh, P.-R., Gazal, S., Burch, K., Freund, M. K., Schoech, A., Pasaniuc, B., & Price, A. L. (2019) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.11.008 · Cited by 926
Bias, robustness and scalability in single-cell differential expression analysis
Soneson, C., & Robinson, M. D. (2018) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4612 · Cited by 770
Salcher, S., Sturm, G., Horvath, L., Untergasser, G., Kuempers, C., Fotakis, G., Panizzolo, E., Martowicz, A., Trebo, M., Pall, G., et al. (2022) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2022.10.008 · Cited by 477
Metadata
- Authors
- Ignatiadis, N., Klaus, B., Zaugg, J. B., & Huber, W.
- Venue
- Nature Methods
- Published
- 2016-05-30
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 577-580
- ISSN
- 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-7105
- OpenAlex
- W2418024629
- Cited by
- 649
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 15.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
