The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
False Discovery Rate Control With Groups
Open accessAbstract
In the context of large-scale multiple hypothesis testing, the hypotheses often possess certain group structures based on additional information such as Gene Ontology in gene expression data and phenotypes in genome-wide association studies. It is hence desirable to incorporate such information when dealing with multiplicity problems to increase statistical power. In this article, we demonstrate the benefit of considering group structure by presenting a p-value weighting procedure which utilizes the relative importance of each group while controlling the false discovery rate under weak conditions. The procedure is easy to implement and shown to be more powerful than the classical Benjamini-Hochberg procedure in both theoretical and simulation studies. By estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses, the data-driven procedure controls the false discovery rate asymptotically. Our analysis on one breast cancer dataset confirms that the procedure performs favorably compared with the classical method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency
Benjamini, Y., & Yekutieli, D. (2001) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1013699998 · Cited by 10,490
Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer
van 't Veer, L. J., Dai, H., van de Vijver, M. J., He, Y. D., Hart, A. A. M., Mao, M., Peterse, H. L., van der Kooy, K., Marton, M. J., Witteveen, A. T., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415530a · Cited by 9,536
Cited by
Leveraging Polygenic Functional Enrichment to Improve GWAS Power
Kichaev, G., Bhatia, G., Loh, P.-R., Gazal, S., Burch, K., Freund, M. K., Schoech, A., Pasaniuc, B., & Price, A. L. (2019) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.11.008 · Cited by 926
Imaging human connectomes at the macroscale
Craddock, R. C., Jbabdi, S., Yan, C.-G., Vogelstein, J. T., Castellanos, F. X., Di Martino, A., Kelly, C., Heberlein, K., Colcombe, S., & Milham, M. P. (2013) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2482 · Cited by 419
Zatorski, N., Sun, Y., Elmas, A., Dallago, C., Karl, T., Stein, D., Rost, B., Huang, K.-L., Walsh, M., & Schlessinger, A. (2024) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2024.110640 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Hu, J. X., Zhao, H., & Zhou, H. H.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-09-01
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 491
- Pages
- 1215-1227
- ISSN
- 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2134697512
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: False Discovery Rate Control With Groups. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1198/jasa.2010.tm09329
- The paper
- Hu, J. X., Zhao, H., & Zhou, H. H. (2010). False Discovery Rate Control With Groups. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2010.tm09329
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.