The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploiting rRNA operon copy number to investigate bacterial reproductive strategies
Open accessAbstract
The potential for rapid reproduction is a hallmark of microbial life, but microbes in nature must also survive and compete when growth is constrained by resource availability. Successful reproduction requires different strategies when resources are scarce and when they are abundant1,2, but a systematic framework for predicting these reproductive strategies in bacteria has not been available. Here, we show that the number of ribosomal RNA operons (rrn) in bacterial genomes predicts two important components of reproduction—growth rate and growth efficiency—which are favoured under contrasting regimes of resource availability3,4. We find that the maximum reproductive rate of bacteria doubles with a doubling of rrn copy number, and the efficiency of carbon use is inversely related to maximal growth rate and rrn copy number. We also identify a feasible explanation for these patterns: the rate and yield of protein synthesis mirror the overall pattern in maximum growth rate and growth efficiency. Furthermore, comparative analysis of genomes from 1,167 bacterial species reveals that rrn copy number predicts traits associated with resource availability, including chemotaxis and genome streamlining. Genome-wide patterns of orthologous gene content covary with rrn copy number, suggesting convergent evolution in response to resource availability. Our findings imply that basic cellular processes adapt in contrasting ways to long-term differences in resource availability. They also establish a basis for predicting changes in bacterial community composition in response to resource perturbations using rrn copy number measurements5 or inferences6,7.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools
Quast, C., Pruesse, E., Yilmaz, P., Gerken, J., Schweer, T., Yarza, P., Peplies, J., & Glöckner, F. O. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks1219 · Cited by 33,055
ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis
Wickham, H. (2009) · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3 · Cited by 14,447
phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things)
Revell, L. J. (2012) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2011.00169.x · Cited by 9,277
KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation
Kanehisa, M., Sato, Y., Kawashima, M., Furumichi, M., & Tanabe, M. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1070 · Cited by 7,387
ARB: a software environment for sequence data
Ludwig, W. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh293 · Cited by 6,702
(2009) · Cited by 6,571
MCMC Methods for Multi-Response Generalized Linear Mixed Models: The MCMCglmmR Package
Hadfield, J. D. (2010) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v033.i02 · Cited by 4,799
Data, information, knowledge and principle: back to metabolism in KEGG
Kanehisa, M., Goto, S., Sato, Y., Kawashima, M., Furumichi, M., & Tanabe, M. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1076 · Cited by 3,092
Protein content and protein synthesis rates of planktonic marine bacteria
Simon, M., & Azam, F. (1989) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps051201 · Cited by 1,801
Cooperation and Competition in the Evolution of ATP-Producing Pathways
Pfeiffer, T., Schuster, S., & Bonhoeffer, S. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1058079 · Cited by 1,354
Cited by
Zhalnina, K., Louie, K. B., Hao, Z., Mansoori, N., da Rocha, U. N., Shi, S., Cho, H., Karaoz, U., Loqué, D., Bowen, B. P., et al. (2018) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-018-0129-3 · Cited by 2,368
Microbial Community Resilience across Ecosystems and Multiple Disturbances
Philippot, L., Griffiths, B. S., & Langenheder, S. (2021) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00026-20 · Cited by 562
Environmental Factors Support the Formation of Specific Bacterial Assemblages on Microplastics
Oberbeckmann, S., Kreikemeyer, B., & Labrenz, M. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.02709 · Cited by 549
Temperature sensitivity of SOM decomposition is linked with a K‐selected microbial community
Li, H., Yang, S., Semenov, M. V., Yao, F., Ye, J., Bu, R., Ma, R., Lin, J., Kurganova, I., Wang, X., et al. (2021) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.15593 · Cited by 537
Primer, Pipelines, Parameters: Issues in 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing
Abellan-Schneyder, I., Matchado, M. S., Reitmeier, S., Sommer, A., Sewald, Z., Baumbach, J., List, M., & Neuhaus, K. (2021) · mSphere · doi:10.1128/msphere.01202-20 · Cited by 498
Metadata
- Authors
- Roller, B. R. K., Stoddard, S. F., & Schmidt, T. M.
- Venue
- Nature Microbiology
- Published
- 2016-09-12
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 16160-16160
- ISSN
- 2058-5276 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2520096949
- Cited by
- 591
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 23.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploiting rRNA operon copy number to investigate bacterial reproductive strategies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.160
- The paper
- Roller, B. R. K., Stoddard, S. F., & Schmidt, T. M. (2016). Exploiting rRNA operon copy number to investigate bacterial reproductive strategies. Nature Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.160
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.