Cited by 538CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology

Programmable transcriptional repression in mycobacteria using an orthogonal CRISPR interference platform

Open access
Rock, Jeremy M., Hopkins, Forrest F., Chavez, Alejandro, Diallo, Marieme, Chase, Michael R., Gerrick, Elias R., Pritchard, Justin R., Church, George M. +4 more·2017·Nature Microbiology

Abstract

The development of new drug regimens that allow rapid, sterilizing treatment of tuberculosis has been limited by the complexity and time required for genetic manipulations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) promises to be a robust, easily engineered and scalable platform for regulated gene silencing. However, in M. tuberculosis, the existing Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9-based CRISPRi system is of limited utility because of relatively poor knockdown efficiency and proteotoxicity. To address these limitations, we screened eleven diverse Cas9 orthologues and identified four that are broadly functional for targeted gene knockdown in mycobacteria. The most efficacious of these proteins, the CRISPR1 Cas9 from Streptococcus thermophilus (dCas9 Sth1), typically achieves 20- to 100-fold knockdown of endogenous gene expression with minimal proteotoxicity. In contrast to other CRISPRi systems, dCas9 Sth1-mediated gene knockdown is robust when targeted far from the transcriptional start site, thereby allowing high-resolution dissection of gene function in the context of bacterial operons. We demonstrate the utility of this system by addressing persistent controversies regarding drug synergies in the mycobacterial folate biosynthesis pathway. We anticipate that the dCas9 Sth1 CRISPRi system will have broad utility for functional genomics, genetic interaction mapping and drug-target profiling in M. tuberculosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.274

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CRISPRi technology was developed and optimized in M. smegmatis and its application to fine-tune gene repression was demonstrated in M. tuberculosis.

    “Like other method breakthroughs, the CRISPRi technology was developed and optimized in M. smegmatis (35) and its application to fine-tune gene repression elegantly demonstrated in M. tuberculosis (36).”

    From Mycobacterium smegmatis: The Vanguard of Mycobacterial Research (2023) · cites this paper as [35]

    The Results section, “Gene silencing with CRISPRi in M. tuberculosis” (page unavailable), says the system was developed in M. smegmatis and then shown to produce robust knockdown in M. tuberculosis. The Discussion says knockdown magnitude is tunable, but the Results section, “Identification of synergistic interactions in the folate biosynthesis pathway” (page unavailable), describes its explicit demonstration of partial, tuned knockdown in M. smegmatis, not M. tuberculosis. Thus the claimed fine-tuning demonstration in M. tuberculosis is not established by these passages. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rock, J. M., Hopkins, F. F., Chavez, A., Diallo, M., Chase, M. R., Gerrick, E. R., Pritchard, J. R., Church, G. M., Rubin, E. J., Sassetti, C. M., Schnappinger, D., & Fortune, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Fortune, Sarah M.
Venue
Nature Microbiology
Published
2017-02-06
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
16274-16274
ISSN
2058-5276 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2586637020
Cited by
538
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 61 · 2025: 78 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 4
FWCI
15.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (P50HG005550)
  • National Cancer Institute (T32CA009216)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI064282, U19AI107774, U19AI109755, R01AI097191)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Keywords
CRISPR interference, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, transcriptional repression, gene knockdown efficiency, proteotoxicity, drug synergy, bacterial operons, tuberculosis drug development, functional genomics
MeSH terms
CRISPR-Associated Protein 9, Bacterial Proteins, Endonucleases, Genetic Techniques, Mycobacterium, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Operon, Streptococcus pyogenes, Transcription, Genetic, Gene Expression, Gene Silencing, Transcription Initiation Site, Streptococcus thermophilus, Gene Knockdown Techniques, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review