Cited by 554Multisensory perception and integrationVisual perception and processing mechanismsVestibular and auditory disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neural correlates of multisensory cue integration in macaque MSTd

Open access
Gu, Yong, Angelaki, Dora E, DeAngelis, Gregory C·2008·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

Human observers combine multiple sensory cues synergistically to achieve greater perceptual sensitivity, but little is known about the underlying neuronal mechanisms. We recorded the activity of neurons in the dorsal medial superior temporal (MSTd) area during a task in which trained monkeys combined visual and vestibular cues near-optimally to discriminate heading. During bimodal stimulation, MSTd neurons combined visual and vestibular inputs linearly with subadditive weights. Neurons with congruent heading preferences for visual and vestibular stimuli showed improvements in sensitivity that parallel behavioral effects. In contrast, neurons with opposite preferences showed diminished sensitivity under cue combination. Responses of congruent cells were more strongly correlated with monkeys' perceptual decisions than were responses of opposite cells, suggesting that the monkey monitored the activity of congruent cells to a greater extent during cue integration. These findings show that perceptual cue integration occurs in nonhuman primates and identify a population of neurons that may form its neural basis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.2191

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 51 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–550 of 550

Metadata

Authors
Gu, Y., Angelaki, D. E., & DeAngelis, G. C.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
DeAngelis, Gregory C
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2008-09-07
Volume
11
Issue
10
Pages
1201-1210
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2417476499
Cited by
554
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 37
FWCI
37.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Eye Institute (R01EY017866, EY-017866, EY-016178, R01EY016178)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
Keywords
visual-vestibular integration, perceptual sensitivity, neural correlates, perceptual decision making, macaque
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Cues, Kinesthesis, Functional Laterality, Macaca mulatta, Models, Neurological, Motion Perception, Neurons, Orientation, Photic Stimulation, Probability, Psychometrics, Psychophysics, Reaction Time, Temporal Lobe, Visual Perception, Signal Detection, Psychological, Head Movements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review