Cited by 1,463Multisensory perception and integrationTactile and Sensory InteractionsVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Is neocortex essentially multisensory?

GHAZANFAR, A, SCHROEDER, C·2006·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Although sensory perception and neurobiology are traditionally investigated one modality at a time, real world behaviour and perception are driven by the integration of information from multiple sensory sources. Mounting evidence suggests that the neural underpinnings of multisensory integration extend into early sensory processing. This article examines the notion that neocortical operations are essentially multisensory. We first review what is known about multisensory processing in higher-order association cortices and then discuss recent anatomical and physiological findings in presumptive unimodal sensory areas. The pervasiveness of multisensory influences on all levels of cortical processing compels us to reconsider thinking about neural processing in unisensory terms. Indeed, the multisensory nature of most, possibly all, of the neocortex forces us to abandon the notion that the senses ever operate independently during real-world cognition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2006.04.008

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multisensory integration is critical for understanding and interpreting incoming sensory information from multiple modalities and ultimately provides context to a sensory experience that shapes one's own embodied representation of the self in relation to his/her surroundings.

    “Multisensory integration is critical for understanding and interpreting incoming sensory information from multiple modalities (i.e., interoceptive or exteroceptive) and ultimately provides context to a sensory experience that shapes one’s own embodied representation of the self in relation to his/her surroundings (Figure 6; Couto et al., 2013; Ghazanfar and Schroeder, 2006; Macaluso and Driver, 20”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
GHAZANFAR, A., & SCHROEDER, C.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
Corresponding author
  • GHAZANFAR, A
  • SCHROEDER, C
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-06
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
278-285
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2073227393
Cited by
1,463
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 103 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 113 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 67 · 2015: 72 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 85 · 2012: 86
FWCI
84.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r03tw005674-03)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH61989, R01MH061989)
  • Fogarty International Center (TW05674)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
multisensory integration, neocortex, association cortex, early sensory processing, cortical processing
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Mapping, Humans, Mental Processes, Neural Pathways, Sensation, Neocortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review