Cited by 161Visual perception and processing mechanismsNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsNeural dynamics and brain function

Retinal origin of orientation maps in visual cortex.

Open access
Paik, Se-Bum, Ringach, Dario L·2011·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

The orientation map is a hallmark of primary visual cortex in higher mammals. It is not yet known how orientation maps develop, what function they have in visual processing and why some species lack them. Here we advance the notion that quasi-periodic orientation maps are established by moiré interference of regularly spaced ON- and OFF-center retinal ganglion cell mosaics. A key prediction of the theory is that the centers of iso-orientation domains must be arranged in a hexagonal lattice on the cortical surface. Here we show that such a pattern is observed in individuals of four different species: monkeys, cats, tree shrews and ferrets. The proposed mechanism explains how orientation maps can develop without requiring precise patterns of spontaneous activity or molecular guidance. Further, it offers a possible account for the emergence of orientation tuning in single neurons despite the absence of orderly orientation maps in rodents species.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.2824

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paik, S.-B., & Ringach, D. L.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Ringach, Dario L
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2011-05-29
Volume
14
Issue
7
Pages
919-925
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2059584584
Cited by
161
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Eye Institute (R01EY018322, EY018322)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
orientation maps, primary visual cortex, retinal ganglion cells, receptive fields, moiré interference, hexagonal lattice, orientation tuning, species differences, visual development, tree shrew, ferrets, monkeys, cats
MeSH terms
Animals, Haplorhini, Brain Mapping, Cats, Computer Simulation, Ferrets, Models, Biological, Orientation, Periodicity, Photic Stimulation, Retina, Retinal Ganglion Cells, Space Perception, Tupaiidae, Visual Cortex, Visual Fields, Visual Pathways, Visual Perception, Models, Statistical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review