The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance
Abstract
In theory, a comparison of two experimental effects requires a statistical test on their difference. In practice, this comparison is often based on an incorrect procedure involving two separate tests in which researchers conclude that effects differ when one effect is significant (P < 0.05) but the other is not (P > 0.05). We reviewed 513 behavioral, systems and cognitive neuroscience articles in five top-ranking journals (Science, Nature, Nature Neuroscience, Neuron and The Journal of Neuroscience) and found that 78 used the correct procedure and 79 used the incorrect procedure. An additional analysis suggests that incorrect analyses of interactions are even more common in cellular and molecular neuroscience. We discuss scenarios in which the erroneous procedure is particularly beguiling.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Use of multiple analyses on the same data set and selective reports of statistical methods used, or insufficient correction for multiple comparisons, can cause inflation in effects (29).”
From Statistical and Methodological Considerations for the Interpretation of Intranasal Oxytocin Studies (2016) · cites this paper as [29]
In the citing paper
“priming and awareness are typically tested by comparing two separate tests”
From Evidence for unconscious priming using a Bayesian single-subject approach (2026) · cites this paper as Nieuwenhuis et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“However, this approach is fundamentally flawed (Nieuwenhuis et al. 2011, Meyen et al. 2022).”
From Evidence for unconscious priming using a Bayesian single-subject approach (2026) · cites this paper as Nieuwenhuis et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“In this approach, the comparison of two experimental effects is performed by executing two separate t-tests and independently establishing significance for each. When one turns out to be significant and the other is not, one concludes that they are different (Nieuwenhuis et al. 2011).”
From Evidence for unconscious priming using a Bayesian single-subject approach (2026) · cites this paper as Nieuwenhuis et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“The combination of two Bayesian t-tests (one to determine the presence or absence of awareness and another to determine the presence of a priming effect) essentially suffers from the same problem as executing two frequentist t-tests: the comparison of two experimental effects requires a statistical test on their difference”
From Evidence for unconscious priming using a Bayesian single-subject approach (2026) · cites this paper as Nieuwenhuis et al. 2011
Citations
Cites
Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs
Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03210951 · Cited by 2,433
The Difference Between “Significant” and “Not Significant” is not Itself Statistically Significant
Gelman, A., & Stern, H. (2006) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1198/000313006x152649 · Cited by 1,407 · cited 1×
“Although superficially compelling, the latter type of statistical reasoning is erroneous because the difference between significant and not significant need not itself be statistically significan”
BackgroundError bars in experimental biology
Cumming, G., Fidler, F., & Vaux, D. L. (2007) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200611141 · Cited by 940
Statistical procedures and the justification of knowledge in psychological science.
Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1989) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.44.10.1276 · Cited by 863
Statistical procedures and the justification of knowledge in psychological science.
Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1992) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/10109-027 · Cited by 653
Guidelines for reporting an fMRI study
Poldrack, R. A., Fletcher, P. C., Henson, R. N., Worsley, K. J., Brett, M., & Nichols, T. E. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.11.048 · Cited by 550
What can Functional Neuroimaging Tell the Experimental Psychologist?
Henson, R. (2005) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/02724980443000502 · Cited by 327
The Interpretation of Levels of Significance by Psychological Researchers
Rosenthal, R., & Gaito, J. M. (1963) · The Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00223980.1963.9916596 · Cited by 183
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 868
Testing for effects of different stimuli on neuronal firing relative to background activity
Steinmetz, P. N., & Thorp, C. K. (2013) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/10/5/056019 · Cited by 9
Provenzano, J., Bastiaansen, J. A., Verduyn, P., Oldehinkel, A. J., Fossati, P., & Kuppens, P. (2018) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00501 · Cited by 9
A priori power considerations in orthodontic research: a 3 year meta-epidemiologic study
Gratsia, S., Koletsi, D., Fleming, P. S., & Pandis, N. (2019) · European Journal of Orthodontics · doi:10.1093/ejo/cjz061 · Cited by 9
Learning from the past to develop data analysis curricula for the future
Weissgerber, T. L. (2021) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001343 · Cited by 9
Lin, C., Knowlton, B. J., Wu, A. D., Iacoboni, M., Yang, H., Ye, Y.-L., Liu, K.-H., & Chiang, M. (2016) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.03.010 · Cited by 9
Spatial metaphors in thinking about other people
Gozli, D. G., Lockwood, P., Chasteen, A. L., & Pratt, J. (2018) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506285.2018.1445153 · Cited by 9
Friend or Foe: The Influence of Ambient Sound on Risk Perception
Payzan-LeNestour, É., Pradier, L., Doran, J. S., Nave, G., & Balleine, B. W. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-84359-7 · Cited by 9
Testosterone facilitates the sense of agency
van der Westhuizen, D., Moore, J., Solms, M., & van Honk, J. (2017) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2017.10.005 · Cited by 10
Alhouayek, M., Boldrup, L., & Fowler, C. J. (2019) · Cancer Investigation · doi:10.1080/07357907.2019.1638394 · Cited by 9
Montefinese, M., Ciavarro, M., & Ambrosini, E. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01349 · Cited by 9
2016: Reviewing forRadiology—Reporting Guidelines and Why We Use Them
Levine, D., & Kressel, H. Y. (2016) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2016161204 · Cited by 10
Using meta-analysis for evidence synthesis: The case of incomplete neutralization in GermanPreprint
Nicenboim, B., Roettger, T. B., & Vasishth, S. (2018) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/p5a4z · Cited by 9
Interference patterns in subject-verb agreement and reflexives revisited: A large-sample studyPreprint
Jäger, L. A., Mertzen, D., Dyke, J. A. V., & Vasishth, S. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/7c4gu · Cited by 9
Kohl, S. H., Mehler, D. M. A., Lührs, M., Thibault, R. T., Konrad, K., & Sorger, B. (2022) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.907941 · Cited by 9
Statistical experiment design for animal researchPreprint
Sorzano, C. Ó. S. (2023) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/e9s25 · Cited by 9
Nuiten, S. A., de Gee, J. W., Zantvoord, J. B., Fahrenfort, J. J., & van Gaal, S. (2024) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0019-24.2024 · Cited by 8
Navigating the paradigm shift of sex inclusive preclinical research and lessons learnt
Karp, N. A. (2025) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-025-08118-4 · Cited by 8
Independent effects of emotional arousal and reward anticipation on episodic memory formation
Gieske, A., & Sommer, T. (2022) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhac359 · Cited by 8
Martin, T., Kero, K., Požar, R., Giordani, B., & Kavcic, V. (2023) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-220981 · Cited by 8
Cholinergic Activation of Corticofugal Circuits in the Adult Mouse Prefrontal Cortex
Gulledge, A. T. (2023) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1388-23.2023 · Cited by 8
Gelman, A. (2011) · CHANCE · doi:10.1080/09332480.2011.10739888 · Cited by 8
Efficient estimation of Weber’s W
Piantadosi, S. T. (2015) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-014-0558-8 · Cited by 8
Statistics from an HCI perspective
Martens, J.-B. (2012) · International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI) · doi:10.1145/2254556.2254629 · Cited by 8
Self-perceived sociosexuality and mate value asymmetry in heterosexual romantic relationships
Gomuła, A., Nowak‐Szczepanska, N., & Danel, D. P. (2014) · Anthropological Review · doi:10.2478/anre-2014-0022 · Cited by 8
Short-Term Learning and Memory: Training and Perceptual Learning
Carcagno, S., & Plack, C. J. (2017) · Springer handbook of auditory research · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47944-6_4 · Cited by 8
Cross-modal working memory binding and word recognition skills: how specific is the link?
Wang, S., & Allen, R. J. (2017) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2017.1380835 · Cited by 11
Ruge, J., Ehlers, M. R., Kastrinogiannis, A., Klingelhöfer-Jens, M., Koppold, A., Abend, R., & Lonsdorf, T. B. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/nfpbj · Cited by 7
Spit, S., Geambașu, A., van Renswoude, D. R., Blom, E., Fikkert, P., Hunnius, S., Junge, C., Verhagen, J., Visser, I., Wijnen, F. N. K., et al. (2023) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.13377 · Cited by 10
Rydzik, Ł., Obmiński, Z., Wąsacz, W., Kopańska, M., Kubacki, R., Bagińska, M., Tota, Ł. M., Ambroży, T., Witkowski, K., & Pałka, T. (2023) · Biology of Sport · doi:10.5114/biolsport.2024.133662 · Cited by 7
Decoupling Judgment and Decision Making: A Tale of Two Tails
Oral, B., Dragicevic, P., Telea, A. C., & Dimara, E. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2023.3346640 · Cited by 7
Errores conceptuales de estadística más comunes en publicaciones científicas
Chile, U. S. T. , Pinel, R. A. M., Márquez, A. C., & de Caldas, U. (2017) · CES Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia · doi:10.21615/cesmvz.12.3.4 · Cited by 7
Testing ANOVA Replications by Means of the Prior Predictive p-Value
Zondervan-Zwijnenburg, M. A. J., van de Schoot, R., & Hoijtink, H. (2022) · Meta-Psychology · doi:10.15626/mp.2019.1615 · Cited by 7
Individual attractiveness preferences differentially modulate immediate and voluntary attention
Roth, T. S., Samara, I., Perea‐García, J. O., & Kret, M. E. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-29240-5 · Cited by 8
Pretrial predictors of conflict response efficacy in the human prefrontal cortex
Herman, A. B., Smith, E. H., Schevon, C. A., Yates, M. J., McKhann, G. M., Botvinick, M., Hayden, B. Y., & Sheth, S. A. (2023) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2023.108047 · Cited by 7
Receiver operating characteristic analysis of age-related changes in lineup performance
Humphries, J. E., & Flowe, H. D. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2014.12.009 · Cited by 7
Improving animal models for nervous system disorders
Brown, R. E. (2012) · Genes Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1111/j.1601-183x.2012.00808.x · Cited by 8
Receptive multilingualism across the lifespan
Vanhove, J. (2014) · Cited by 7
Makin, A. D. J., Lawson, R., Bertamini, M., & Pickering, J. (2013) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.816751 · Cited by 7
Moss, A., Miles, C., Elsley, J. V., & Johnson, A. J. (2019) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2019.1653469 · Cited by 7
Danel, D. P., Kozak, K., Szala, A., Kunert‐Keil, C., Dziedzic-Danel, A., & Siennicka, A. E. (2019) · Neurophysiology · doi:10.1007/s11062-020-09841-w · Cited by 7
Minimising statistical errors in the research domain
Dhulkhed, V., Tantry, T. P., & Kurdi, M. (2021) · Indian Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.4103/ija.ija_720_21 · Cited by 7
Symmetry Lasts Longer Than Random, but Only for Brief Presentations
Ogden, R., Makin, A. D. J., Palumbo, L., & Bertamini, M. (2016) · i-Perception · doi:10.1177/2041669516676824 · Cited by 7
Stress Induces Contextual Blindness in Lotteries and Coordination Games
Brocas, I., Carrillo, J. D., & Kendall, R. (2017) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00236 · Cited by 7
Digital Deals: Strategies for Selecting and Structuring Partnerships
Geis, G. S., & Geis, G. T. (2001) · Cited by 7
Domain-general brain regions do not track linguistic input as closely as language-selective regionsPreprint
Blank, I., & Fedorenko, E. G. (2016) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/076240 · Cited by 7
DSM-5 Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Sex Differences in EEG Activity
Dupuy, F. E., Clarke, A. R., Barry, R. J., McCarthy, R., & Selikowitz, M. (2021) · Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback · doi:10.1007/s10484-021-09522-2 · Cited by 6
Factorial Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Janczyk, M., & Pfister, R. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-66786-6_9 · Cited by 6
The Need for Nuance in the Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Debate
Häggström, O. (2016) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164416668233 · Cited by 6
Finding word boundaries in Indian English-accented speech
Hawthorne, K. E., Järvikivi, J., & Tucker, B. V. (2017) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2017.09.008 · Cited by 6
Högden, F., & Unkelbach, C. (2020) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167220945538 · Cited by 6
How to Test Cognitive Theory with fMRI
Chatham, C. H., & Badre, D. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429318405-5 · Cited by 6
Milovanovic, J. P., Filipović, S. A., Marchisio, P., Haggard, M. P., Zhang, M., & Spencer, H. (2016) · International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology · doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.01.037 · Cited by 7
Changing similarity: Stable and flexible modulations of psychological dimensions
Dieciuc, M., Roque, N. A., & Folstein, J. R. (2017) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2017.06.026 · Cited by 6
Remaining Puzzles about Morpheme Production in the Posterior Temporal Lobe
Fedorenko, E. G., Williams, Z. M., & Ferreira, V. S. (2018) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.09.032 · Cited by 6
Affective touch during the processing of angry facial expressions: an event-related potential study
Schienle, A., Scheucher, J., & Zorjan, S. (2022) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108433 · Cited by 6
Landes, T. L., Kashima, Y., & Howe, P. D. L. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0162695 · Cited by 6
Giummo, J., & Johnson, W. (2012) · Behavior Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10519-012-9552-z · Cited by 6
ECT seizure quality and serum BDNF, revisited
Sartorius, A., Bumb, J. M., Aksay, S. S., Gass, P., Hellweg, R., & Kranaster, L. (2015) · European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/s00406-015-0580-6 · Cited by 6
It is about time we put an end to the dehumanisation of the academic world
CORNELIS, G. C. (2014) · The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care · doi:10.3109/13625187.2013.879382 · Cited by 6
Veldkamp, C. L. S. (2017) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/g8cjq · Cited by 6
Evans, A. M., & Brandt, M. J. (2019) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797618815482 · Cited by 6
Guidelines on design, measurement and statistics for Appetite
Geary, N., & Higgs, S. (2021) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2021.105731 · Cited by 6
Better Inference in Neuroscience: Test Less, Estimate More
Calin-Jageman, R. J. (2022) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1133-22.2022 · Cited by 6
Cross-hemispheric recruitment during action planning with increasing task demand
Schach, S., Braun, D. A., & Lindner, A. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-41926-4 · Cited by 5
Kocharian, A., Redish, A. D., & Rothwell, P. E. (2025) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-025-02015-z · Cited by 5
Ciubotariu, I. I., & Bosch, G. (2023) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011160 · Cited by 5
Yin, H. H. (2025) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101487 · Cited by 5
Memory-guided reaching in a patient with visual hemiagnosia
Cornelsen, S., Rennig, J., & Himmelbach, M. (2016) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2016.03.010 · Cited by 5
Vlasceanu, M., Drach, R. D., & Coman, A. (2018) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-018-1481-2 · Cited by 5
Ma, Y., Ma, H., & Chen, X. (2019) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107216 · Cited by 5
Malik-Moraleda, S., Cucu, T., Lipkin, B., & Fedorenko, E. G. (2021) · Neurobiology of Language · doi:10.1162/nol_a_00058 · Cited by 7
McCarthy, W., Huq, S. N., Allen, K., Scally, L. C., Petri, A., Wujek, M., & Sachs, B. D. (2022) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2022.958342 · Cited by 5
Queirazza, F., Steele, J. D., Krishnadas, R., Cavanagh, J., & Philiastides, M. G. (2023) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_02062 · Cited by 5
Spatiotemporal predictability alters perceived duration of visual events: Memento effect revisited.
Meyerhoff, H. S., Vanes, L. D., & Huff, M. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000048 · Cited by 5
Malpas, C. B., Saling, M. M., Velakoulis, D., Desmond, P. M., Hicks, R. J., Zetterberg, H., Blennow, K., & O'Brien, T. J. (2018) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-170250 · Cited by 5
Visual Enhancement of Relevant Speech in a ‘Cocktail Party’
Jaha, N., Shen, S., Kerlin, J. R., & Shahin, A. J. (2019) · Multisensory Research · doi:10.1163/22134808-20191423 · Cited by 5
Corticospinal properties are associated with sensorimotor performance in action video game players
Giboin, L., Tom, R., & Grüber, M. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117576 · Cited by 8
Lexically-guided perceptual learning does generalize to new phonetic contexts
Nelson, S., & Durvasula, K. (2020) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2020.101019 · Cited by 5
Comment on “Math at home adds up to achievement in school”
Frank, M. C. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad8008 · Cited by 5
Zeigler‐Hill, V., & Shackelford, T. K. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_302244 · Cited by 5
Kvamme, T. L., Lindeløv, J. K., Thomsen, K. R., Overgaard, R., & Overgaard, M. S. (2024) · Discover Psychology · doi:10.1007/s44202-024-00162-1 · Cited by 4
The emerging submission crisis in behavioral science
Spitzer, M. (2026) · Trends in Neuroscience and Education · doi:10.1016/j.tine.2026.100276 · Cited by 5
Evaluating the performance of ChatGPT-5, Claude, and DeepSeek for statistical analysis in medicine
Sebo, P., & Wang, T. (2026) · Internal and Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11739-026-04291-4 · Cited by 4
Qiu, Z., Becker, S. I., Xia, H., Hamblin-Frohman, Z., & Pegna, A. J. (2023) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2023.107148 · Cited by 4
Novelty–retrieval–extinction paradigm to decrease high-intensity fear memory recurrence
Shi, P., Chen, W., Li, J., Weng, Y., Zhang, M., & Zheng, X. (2024) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2024.02.088 · Cited by 4
Histone H4 acetylation differentially modulates proliferation in adult oligodendrocyte progenitors
Dansu, D. K., Selcen, I., Sauma, S., Prentice, E., Huang, D., Li, M., Moyon, S., & Casaccia, P. (2024) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.202308064 · Cited by 4
Cortical Contributions to Attentional Orienting and Response Cancellation in Action Stopping
Kemp, S. A., Salomoni, S. E., Bazin, P., Pash, L., George, R. J. S., & Hinder, M. R. (2026) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.70397 · Cited by 4
Effects of prosodic cues on topic continuity in child language production
Vernice, M., & Guasti, M. T. (2014) · First Language · doi:10.1177/0142723714550111 · Cited by 4
R AS THE ENVIRONMENT FOR DATA ANALYSIS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL EVALUATION
García, A. M. R., & Puga, J. L. (2016) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 4
Social environment affects central distribution of estrogen receptor-α in Peromyscus californicus
Ruscio, M. G., King, S. B., Sims, S., & McKendrick, G. (2018) · General and Comparative Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.ygcen.2018.08.018 · Cited by 4
Doherty, B. R., van Ede, F., Fraser, A., Patai, E. Z., Nobre, A. C., & Scerif, G. (2019) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01379 · Cited by 4
Mundry, R. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108674218.003 · Cited by 4
Lu, J., & Wen, C. (2019) · Small Methods · doi:10.1002/smtd.201900386 · Cited by 4
Human Cognitive Neuroscience as It Is Taught
Hauk, O. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.587922 · Cited by 4
Fisher, K. M., Garner, J. P., & Darian‐Smith, C. (2022) · The Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.25395 · Cited by 4
Bickel, D. R. (2023) · Statistics · doi:10.1080/02331888.2023.2232912 · Cited by 4
Null hypothesis significance testing in simulation
Hofmann, M. A. (2016) · Winter Simulation Conference · doi:10.1109/wsc.2016.7822118 · Cited by 4
Biomonitoring and Digital Data Technology as an Opportunity for Enhancing Animal Study Translation
Defensor, E. B., Lim, M. A., & Schaevitz, L. R. (2021) · ILAR Journal · doi:10.1093/ilar/ilab018 · Cited by 4
Wickelmaier, F. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.07727 · Cited by 4
Hardwicke, T. E. (2017) · Thesis Commons (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31237/osf.io/r4c32 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E.-J.
- Affiliations
- Leiden University (NL)
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Nieuwenhuis, Sander
- Venue
- Nature Neuroscience
- Published
- 2011-08-26
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1105-1107
- ISSN
- 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1726
- OpenAlex
- W2165810797
- Semantic Scholar
- 6ea9a180f01c0c6a4b559511cf362bbfcfd73b87
- Cited by
- 864
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 51 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 69 · 2013: 57 · 2012: 65
- FWCI
- 68.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistics Education and Methodologies
- Keywords
- interaction effects, effect size comparison, significance testing, statistical errors, two-sample t-test, neuroscience literature
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Humans, Neurons, Neurosciences, Statistics as Topic, Reproducibility of Results, Biomedical Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review