Cited by 83Research Data Management PracticesData Analysis and ArchivingFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Sharing neuroimaging studies of human cognition

Horn, John Darrell Van, Grafton, Scott T, Rockmore, Daniel, Gazzaniga, Michael S·2004·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

After more than a decade of collecting large neuroimaging datasets, neuroscientists are now working to archive these studies in publicly accessible databases. In particular, the fMRI Data Center (fMRIDC), a high-performance computing center managed by computer and brain scientists, seeks to catalogue and openly disseminate the data from published fMRI studies to the community. This repository enables experimental validation and allows researchers to combine and examine patterns of brain activity beyond that of any single study. As with some biological databases, early scientific, technical and sociological concerns hindered initial acceptance of the fMRIDC. However, with the continued growth of this and other neuroscience archives, researchers are recognizing the potential of such resources for identifying new knowledge about cognitive and neural activity. Thus, the field of neuroimaging is following the lead of biology and chemistry, mining its accumulating body of knowledge and moving toward a 'discovery science' of brain function.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn1231

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Distilling the extant literature necessitates new techniques for large-scale aggregation and synthesis of human neuroimaging data.

    “Distilling the extant literature thus necessitates development of new techniques for large-scale aggregation and synthesis of human neuroimaging data4-6.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Horn, J. D. V., Grafton, S. T., Rockmore, D., & Gazzaniga, M. S.
Affiliations
Dartmouth College (US)
Corresponding author
Horn, John Darrell Van
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2004-04-27
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
473-481
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2049742527
Cited by
83
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
FWCI
14.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Data Analysis and Archiving
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
neuroimaging data sharing, open data repositories, cognitive neuroscience, brain activation patterns, data integration, discovery science, research data management
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Cooperative Behavior, Diagnostic Imaging, Financial Support, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Medical Informatics, Databases, Factual, Neural Networks, Computer, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review