Sharing neuroimaging studies of human cognition
Abstract
After more than a decade of collecting large neuroimaging datasets, neuroscientists are now working to archive these studies in publicly accessible databases. In particular, the fMRI Data Center (fMRIDC), a high-performance computing center managed by computer and brain scientists, seeks to catalogue and openly disseminate the data from published fMRI studies to the community. This repository enables experimental validation and allows researchers to combine and examine patterns of brain activity beyond that of any single study. As with some biological databases, early scientific, technical and sociological concerns hindered initial acceptance of the fMRIDC. However, with the continued growth of this and other neuroscience archives, researchers are recognizing the potential of such resources for identifying new knowledge about cognitive and neural activity. Thus, the field of neuroimaging is following the lead of biology and chemistry, mining its accumulating body of knowledge and moving toward a 'discovery science' of brain function.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Distilling the extant literature necessitates new techniques for large-scale aggregation and synthesis of human neuroimaging data.
“Distilling the extant literature thus necessitates development of new techniques for large-scale aggregation and synthesis of human neuroimaging data4-6.”
From Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data. (2011) · cites this paper as [5]
Cites
The Predictive Value of Changes in Effective Connectivity for Human Learning
Büchel, C., Coull, J. T., & Friston, K. J. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.283.5407.1538 · Cited by 447 · see citing works
The emotional modulation of cognitive processing: an fMRI study
Simpson, J. R., Öngür, D., Akbudak, E., Conturo, T. E., Ollinger, J. M., Snyder, A. Z., Gusnard, D. A., & Raichle, M. E. (2000) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892900564019 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data.
Yarkoni, T., Poldrack, R. A., Nichols, T. E., Van Essen, D. C., & Wager, T. D. (2011) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1635 · Cited by 3,686 · see citing works
Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data?
POLDRACK, R. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.004 · Cited by 2,230 · see citing works
Salimi-Khorshidi, G., Smith, S. M., Keltner, J. R., Wager, T. D., & Nichols, T. E. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.039 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
Functionality of sugars in foods and health
Clemens, R. A., Jones, J. M., Kern, M., Lee, S., Mayhew, E. J., Slavin, J. L., & Zivanovic, S. (2016) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12194 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Cognitive neuroscience 2.0: building a cumulative science of human brain function
Yarkoni, T., Poldrack, R. A., Van Essen, D. C., & Wager, T. D. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.08.004 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Neurocognitive Phenotypes and Genetic Dissection of Disorders of Brain and Behavior
Congdon, E., Poldrack, R. A., & Freimer, N. B. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.10.007 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- Horn, J. D. V., Grafton, S. T., Rockmore, D., & Gazzaniga, M. S.
- Affiliations
- Dartmouth College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Horn, John Darrell Van
- Venue
- Nature Neuroscience
- Published
- 2004-04-27
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 473-481
- ISSN
- 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1726
- OpenAlex
- W2049742527
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 14.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Data Analysis and Archiving
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Keywords
- neuroimaging data sharing, open data repositories, cognitive neuroscience, brain activation patterns, data integration, discovery science, research data management
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Cooperative Behavior, Diagnostic Imaging, Financial Support, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Medical Informatics, Databases, Factual, Neural Networks, Computer, Computational Biology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review