The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting the orientation of invisible stimuli from activity in human primary visual cortex
Abstract
Humans can experience aftereffects from oriented stimuli that are not consciously perceived, suggesting that such stimuli receive cortical processing. Determining the physiological substrate of such effects has proven elusive owing to the low spatial resolution of conventional human neuroimaging techniques compared to the size of orientation columns in visual cortex. Here we show that even at conventional resolutions it is possible to use fMRI to obtain a direct measure of orientation-selective processing in V1. We found that many parts of V1 show subtle but reproducible biases to oriented stimuli, and that we could accumulate this information across the whole of V1 using multivariate pattern recognition. Using this information, we could then successfully predict which one of two oriented stimuli a participant was viewing, even when masking rendered that stimulus invisible. Our findings show that conventional fMRI can be used to reveal feature-selective processing in human cortex, even for invisible stimuli.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach
Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., Worsley, K. J., Poline, J. ‐., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1994) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460020402 · Cited by 9,688
Two distinct modes of sensory processing observed in monkey primary visual cortex (V1)
Supèr, H., Spekreijse, H., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/85170 · Cited by 467
Rees, G. (2000) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/123.8.1624 · Cited by 268
Self-citationGUR, M., & SNODDERLY, D. M. (1997) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(96)00183-6 · Cited by 137
Cited by
Representational similarity analysis-connecting the branches of systems neuroscience
Kriegeskorte, N. (2008) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/neuro.06.004.2008 · Cited by 3,355
Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data
Norman, K. A., Polyn, S. M., Detre, G. J., & Haxby, J. V. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.07.005 · Cited by 2,271
Information-based functional brain mapping
Kriegeskorte, N., Goebel, R., & Bandettini, P. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0600244103 · Cited by 2,113
Decoding subject-driven cognitive states with whole-brain connectivity patterns
Shirer, W. R., Ryali, S., Rykhlevskaia, E., Menon, V., & Greicius, M. D. (2012) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr099 · Cited by 1,843
Unconscious determinants of free decisions in the human brain
Soon, C. S., Brass, M., Heinze, H.-J., & Haynes, J.-D. (2008) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2112 · Cited by 1,741
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Haynes, J.-D., & Rees, G.
- Venue
- Nature Neuroscience
- Published
- 2005-04-24
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 686-691
- ISSN
- 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1726
- OpenAlex
- W2041716195
- Cited by
- 867
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 19.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting the orientation of invisible stimuli from activity in human primary visual cortex. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nn1445
- The paper
- Haynes, J.-D., & Rees, G. (2005). Predicting the orientation of invisible stimuli from activity in human primary visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1445
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.