The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
M13-templated magnetic nanoparticles for targeted in vivo imaging of prostate cancer
Open accessAbstract
Molecular imaging allows clinicians to visualize the progression of tumours and obtain relevant information for patient diagnosis and treatment1. Owing to their intrinsic optical, electrical and magnetic properties, nanoparticles are promising contrast agents for imaging dynamic molecular and cellular processes such as protein-protein interactions, enzyme activity or gene expression2. Until now, nanoparticles have been engineered with targeting ligands such as antibodies and peptides to improve tumour specificity and uptake. However, excessive loading of ligands can reduce the targeting capabilities of the ligand3,4,5 and reduce the ability of the nanoparticle to bind to a finite number of receptors on cells6. Increasing the number of nanoparticles delivered to cells by each targeting molecule would lead to higher signal-to-noise ratios and improve image contrast. Here, we show that M13 filamentous bacteriophage can be used as a scaffold to display targeting ligands and multiple nanoparticles for magnetic resonance imaging of cancer cells and tumours in mice. Monodisperse iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles assemble along the M13 coat, and its distal end is engineered to display a peptide that targets SPARC glycoprotein, which is overexpressed in various cancers. Compared with nanoparticles that are directly functionalized with targeting peptides, our approach improves contrast because each SPARC-targeting molecule delivers a large number of nanoparticles into the cells. Moreover, the targeting ligand and nanoparticles could be easily exchanged for others, making this platform attractive for in vivo high-throughput screening and molecular detection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ultra-large-scale syntheses of monodisperse nanocrystals
Park, J., An, K., Hwang, Y., Park, J.-G., Noh, H.-J., Kim, J.-Y., Park, J.-H., Hwang, N.-M., & Hyeon, T. (2004) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat1251 · Cited by 4,076
Cited by
Imaging macrophages with nanoparticles
Weissleder, R., Nahrendorf, M., & Pittet, M. J. (2014) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3780 · Cited by 809
Multifunctional Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery and Molecular Imaging
Bao, G., Mitragotri, S., & Tong, S. (2013) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071812-152409 · Cited by 536
Mi, P., Kokuryo, D., Cabral, H., Wu, H., Terada, Y., Saga, T., Aoki, I., Nishiyama, N., & Kataoka, K. (2016) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2016.72 · Cited by 512
Zhao, Z., Zhou, Z., Bao, J., Wang, Z., Hu, J., Chi, X., Ni, K., Wang, R., Chen, X., Chen, Z., et al. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms3266 · Cited by 477
When self-assembly meets biology: luminescent platinum complexes for imaging applications
Mauro, M., Aliprandi, A., Septiadi, D., Kehr, N. S., & De Cola, L. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c3cs60453e · Cited by 385
Metadata
- Authors
- Ghosh, D., Lee, Y., Thomas, S., Kohli, A. G., Yun, D. S., Belcher, A. M., & Kelly, K. A.
- Venue
- Nature Nanotechnology
- Published
- 2012-09-16
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 677-682
- ISSN
- 1748-3387 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-3395
- OpenAlex
- W2001709848
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: M13-templated magnetic nanoparticles for targeted in vivo imaging of prostate cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nnano.2012.146
- The paper
- Ghosh, D., Lee, Y., Thomas, S., Kohli, A. G., Yun, D. S., Belcher, A. M., & Kelly, K. A. (2012). M13-templated magnetic nanoparticles for targeted in vivo imaging of prostate cancer. Nature Nanotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2012.146
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.