Cited by 54Research Data Management PracticesMachine Learning in Materials ScienceScientific Computing and Data Management

Reproducibility, sharing and progress in nanomaterial databases

Open access
Tropsha, Alexander, Mills, Karmann C., Hickey, Anthony J.·2017·Nature Nanotechnology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nnano.2017.233

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Much of the information on potential repurposing opportunities can already be gleaned from public sources.

    “Much of this information on potential repurposing opportunities can already be gleaned from public sources69.”
  • High-precision microfluidic and micropatterning techniques for the production of highly mono-disperse nanoparticles with uniform physicochemical properties and greatly reduced batch-to-batch variability are rapidly gaining attention.

    “Compared with bulk-synthesis techniques that largely rely on solution-based chemistry, high-precision microfluidic and micropatterning techniques for the production of highly mono-disperse nanoparticles with uniform physicochemical properties and greatly reduced batch-to-batch variability are rapidly gaining attention90,91.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [17]Fourches D. & Tropsha A. Quantitative Nanostructure-Activity Relationships: from Unstructured Data to Predictive Models for Designing Nanomaterials with Controlled Properties. in Nanotoxicology: Progress toward Nanomedicine (eds. Monteiro-Riviere NA & Lang Tran C) (CRC Press, 2014).
  2. [21]Informatics for Materials Science and Engineering. Data-driven Discovery for Accelerated Experimentation and Application. (Elsevier, 2013).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tropsha, A., Mills, K. C., & Hickey, A. J.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • RTI International (US)
Corresponding author
Tropsha, Alexander
Venue
Nature Nanotechnology
Published
2017-12
Volume
12
Issue
12
Pages
1111-1114
ISSN
  • 1748-3387 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-3395
OpenAlex
W2775240084
Cited by
54
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2
FWCI
10.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Nanotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5u01ca207160-03, U01CA207160)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HHSN268201000002C)
  • National Cancer Institute (U01 CA207160, U54CA198999)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (HHSN268201000022C)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
Keywords
reproducibility, data sharing, nanomaterials, research data management, open data
MeSH terms
Databases, Factual, Nanotechnology, Nanostructures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review