Cited by 92Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Materials ScienceNanoparticles: synthesis and applications

Exploring Quantitative Nanostructure-Activity Relationships (QNAR) Modeling as a Tool for Predicting Biological Effects of Manufactured Nanoparticles

Fourches, Denis, Pu, Dongqiuye, Tropsha, Alexander·2011·Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening

Abstract

Evaluation of desired and undesired, biological effects of Manufactured NanoParticles (MNPs) is of critical importance for the future of nanotechnology. Experimental studies, especially toxicological, are time-consuming and costly, calling for the development of efficient computational tools capable of predicting biological events caused by MNPs from their structure and physical chemical properties. This mini-review assesses the potential of modern cheminformatics methods such as Quantitative Structure - Activity Relationship modeling to develop statistically significant and externally predictive models that can accurately forecast biological effects of MNPs from the knowledge of their physical, chemical, and geometrical properties. We discuss major approaches for model building and validation using both experimental and computed properties of nanomaterials. We consider two different categories of MNP datasets: (i) those comprising MNPs with diverse metal cores and organic decorations, for which experimentally measured properties can be used as particle's descriptors, and (ii) those involving MNPs possessing the same core (e.g., carbon nanotubes), but different surface-modifying organic molecules, for which computational descriptors can be calculated for a single representative of the decorative molecule. We illustrate those concepts with three case studies for which we successfully built and validated predictive models. In summary, this mini-review demonstrates that, analogous to conventional applications of QSAR modeling for the analysis of datasets of bioactive organic molecules, its application to modeling MNPs that we term Quantitative Nanostructure Activity Relationship (QNAR) modeling can be useful for (i) predicting activity profiles of novel MNPs solely from their representative descriptors and (ii) designing and manufacturing safer nanomaterials with desired properties.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/138620711794728743

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fourches, D., Pu, D., & Tropsha, A.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening
Published
2011-03-01
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
217-225
ISSN
1386-2073 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2111455508
Cited by
92
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM066940)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
Keywords
engineered nanoparticles, QSAR, cheminformatics, carbon nanotubes, model validation
MeSH terms
Biological Assay, Computer Simulation, Humans, Combinatorial Chemistry Techniques, Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Nanotechnology, Cell Line, Tumor, Nanostructures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review