Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 900

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A STING-activating nanovaccine for cancer immunotherapy

Open access
Luo, Min, Wang, Hua, Wang, Zhaohui, Cai, Haocheng, Lu, Zhigang, Li, Yang, Du, Mingjian, Huang, Gang, Wang, Chensu, Chen, Xiang, Porembka, Matthew R., Lea, Jayanthi, Frankel, Arthur E., Fu, Yang-Xin, Chen, Zhijian J., Gao, Jinming·2017·Nature Nanotechnology

Abstract

Generation of tumor-specific T cells is critically important for cancer immunotherapy1,2. A major challenge in achieving a robust T cell response is the spatio-temporal orchestration of antigen cross-presentation in antigen presenting cells (APCs) with innate stimulation. Here we report a minimalist nanovaccine by a simple physical mixture of an antigen with a synthetic polymeric nanoparticle, PC7A NP, which generated a strong cytotoxic T cell response with low systemic cytokine expression. Mechanistically, PC7A NP achieved efficient cytosolic delivery of tumor antigens to APCs in draining lymph nodes leading to increased surface presentation while simultaneously activating type I interferon-stimulated genes. This effect was dependent on STING but not Toll-like receptor or MAVS pathway. Nanovaccine produced potent tumor growth inhibition in melanoma, colon cancer, and human papilloma virus-E6/E7 tumor models. Combination of PC7A nanovaccine with an anti-PD-1 antibody showed great synergy with 100% survival over 60 days in a TC-1 tumor model. Rechallenging of these tumor-free animals with TC-1 cells led to complete inhibition of tumor growth, suggesting generation of long-term antitumor memory. The STING-activating nanovaccine offers a simple, safe and robust strategy in boosting anti-tumor immunity for cancer immunotherapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nnano.2017.52

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 900

Metadata

Authors
Luo, M., Wang, H., Wang, Z., Cai, H., Lu, Z., Li, Y., Du, M., Huang, G., Wang, C., Chen, X., Porembka, M. R., Lea, J., Frankel, A. E., Fu, Y.-X., Chen, Z. J., & Gao, J.
Venue
Nature Nanotechnology
Published
2017-04-24
Volume
12
Issue
7
Pages
648-654
ISSN
  • 1748-3387 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-3395
OpenAlex
W2606608340
Cited by
900
References
10
FWCI
26.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A STING-activating nanovaccine for cancer immunotherapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nnano.2017.52
The paper
Luo, M., Wang, H., Wang, Z., Cai, H., Lu, Z., Li, Y., Du, M., Huang, G., Wang, C., Chen, X., Porembka, M. R., Lea, J., Frankel, A. E., Fu, Y.-X., Chen, Z. J., & Gao, J. (2017). A STING-activating nanovaccine for cancer immunotherapy. Nature Nanotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2017.52

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.