The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Speckle-free laser imaging using random laser illumination
Open accessAbstract
Many imaging applications require increasingly bright illumination sources, motivating the replacement of conventional thermal light sources with bright light-emitting diodes, superluminescent diodes and lasers. Despite their brightness, lasers and superluminescent diodes are poorly suited for full-field imaging applications because their high spatial coherence leads to coherent artefacts such as speckle that corrupt image formation1,2. We recently demonstrated that random lasers can be engineered to provide low spatial coherence3. Here, we exploit the low spatial coherence of specifically designed random lasers to demonstrate speckle-free full-field imaging in the setting of intense optical scattering. We quantitatively show that images generated with random laser illumination exhibit superior quality than images generated with spatially coherent illumination. By providing intense laser illumination without the drawback of coherent artefacts, random lasers are well suited for a host of full-field imaging applications from full-field microscopy4 to digital light projector systems5. Exploiting the low spatial coherence of specifically designed random lasers, researchers demonstrate speckle-free full-field imaging in the regime of intense optical scattering. Their results show that the quality of images generated from random-laser illumination is superior to those generated from spatially coherent illumination.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Huang, D., Swanson, E. A., Lin, C. P., Schuman, J. S., Stinson, W. G., Chang, W., Hee, M. R., Flotte, T., Gregory, K., Puliafito, C. A., et al. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1957169 · Cited by 13,788
Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics
Mandel, L., & Wolf, E. (1995) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139644105 · Cited by 8,356
Some fundamental properties of speckle*
Goodman, J. W. (1976) · Journal of the Optical Society of America · doi:10.1364/josa.66.001145 · Cited by 2,125
Random Laser Action in Semiconductor Powder
Cao, H., Zhao, Y. G., Ho, S. T., Seelig, E. W., Wang, Q. H., & Chang, R. P. H. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.2278 · Cited by 1,661
Self-citationThe physics and applications of random lasers
Wiersma, D. S. (2008) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys971 · Cited by 1,555
Electrically pumped ultraviolet ZnO diode lasers on Si
Chu, S., Olmedo, M., Yang, Z., Kong, J., & Liu, J. (2008) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.3012579 · Cited by 294
2012 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics
Staff, I. (2012) · Cited by 242
Karamata, B., Lambelet, P., Leutenegger, M., Laubscher, M., Bourquin, S., & Lasser, T. (2005) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.22.001380 · Cited by 63
Lasing action in colloidal CdS∕CdSe∕CdS quantum wells
Xu, J., & Xiao, M. (2005) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.2119423 · Cited by 38
Coherence characteristics of light-emitting diodes
Mehta, D. S., Saxena, K., Dubey, S. K., et al. (2009) · Journal of Luminescence · doi:10.1016/j.jlumin.2009.07.027 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Redding, B., Choma, M. A., & Cao, H.
- Venue
- Nature Photonics
- Published
- 2012-04-29
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 355-359
- ISSN
- 1749-4885 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-4893
- OpenAlex
- W2133037904
- Cited by
- 1,050
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 13.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Speckle-free laser imaging using random laser illumination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nphoton.2012.90
- The paper
- Redding, B., Choma, M. A., & Cao, H. (2012). Speckle-free laser imaging using random laser illumination. Nature Photonics. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2012.90
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.