The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detecting single infrared photons with 93% system efficiency
Open accessAbstract
Single-photon detectors1 at near-infrared wavelengths with high system detection efficiency (>90%), low dark count rate (<1 c.p.s.), low timing jitter (<100 ps) and short reset time (<100 ns) would enable landmark experiments in a variety of fields2,3,4,5,6. Although some of the existing approaches to single-photon detection fulfil one or two of the above specifications1, to date, no detector has met all of the specifications simultaneously. Here, we report on a fibre-coupled single-photon detection system that uses superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors7 and closely approaches the ideal performance of single-photon detectors. Our detector system has a system detection efficiency (including optical coupling losses) greater than 90% in the wavelength range λ = 1,520–1,610 nm, with a device dark count rate (measured with the device shielded from any background radiation) of ∼1 c.p.s., timing jitter of ∼150 ps full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) and reset time of 40 ns. Researchers develop a fiber-coupled single-photon-detection system using amorphous tungsten silicide superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors. The system detection efficiency is higher than 90% in the wavelength range between 1520 nm and 1610 nm. The device dark-count rate, timing jitter and reset time are 1 cps, 150 ps and 40 ns, respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ladd, T. D., Jelezko, F., Laflamme, R., Nakamura, Y., Monroe, C., & O’Brien, J. L. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08812 · Cited by 3,592
Picosecond superconducting single-photon optical detector
Gol’tsman, G. N., Okunev, O., Chulkova, G., Lipatov, A., Semenov, A., Smirnov, K., Voronov, B., Dzardanov, A., Williams, C., & Sobolewski, R. (2001) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.1388868 · Cited by 1,597
Cited by
Advances in quantum cryptography
Pirandola, S., Andersen, U. L., Banchi, L., Berta, M., Bunandar, D., Colbeck, R., Englund, D., Gehring, T., Lupo, C., Ottaviani, C., et al. (2020) · Advances in Optics and Photonics · doi:10.1364/aop.361502 · Cited by 2,033
Ultrawide‐Bandgap Semiconductors: Research Opportunities and Challenges
Tsao, J. Y., Chowdhury, S., Hollis, M. A., Jena, D., Johnson, N. M., Jones, K. A., Kaplar, R. J., Rajan, S., Van de Walle, C. G., Bellotti, E., et al. (2018) · Advanced Electronic Materials · doi:10.1002/aelm.201600501 · Cited by 1,602
Strong Loophole-Free Test of Local Realism
Shalm, L. K., Meyer-Scott, E., Christensen, B. G., Bierhorst, P., Wayne, M. A., Stevens, M. J., Gerrits, T., Glancy, S., Hamel, D. R., Allman, M. S., et al. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.250402 · Cited by 1,402
Self-citationDing, X., He, Y., Duan, Z.-C., Gregersen, N., Chen, M.-C., Unsleber, S., Maier, S., Schneider, C., Kamp, M., Höfling, S., et al. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.020401 · Cited by 908
Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution Over a 404 km Optical Fiber
Yin, H.-L., Chen, T.-Y., Yu, Z.-W., Liu, H., You, L.-X., Zhou, Y.-H., Chen, S.-J., Mao, Y., Huang, M.-Q., Zhang, W.-J., et al. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.190501 · Cited by 836
Metadata
- Authors
- Marsili, F., Verma, V. B., Stern, J. A., Harrington, S., Lita, A. E., Gerrits, T., Vayshenker, I., Baek, B., Shaw, M. D., Mirin, R. P., & Nam, S. W.
- Venue
- Nature Photonics
- Published
- 2013-02-24
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 210-214
- ISSN
- 1749-4885 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-4893
- OpenAlex
- W2010451492
- Cited by
- 1,202
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 71.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detecting single infrared photons with 93% system efficiency. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nphoton.2013.13
- The paper
- Marsili, F., Verma, V. B., Stern, J. A., Harrington, S., Lita, A. E., Gerrits, T., Vayshenker, I., Baek, B., Shaw, M. D., Mirin, R. P., & Nam, S. W. (2013). Detecting single infrared photons with 93% system efficiency. Nature Photonics. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2013.13
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.