Cited by 2,297

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

How the result of a measurement of a component of the spin of a spin- 1/2 particle can turn out to be 100

Aharonov, Yakir, Albert, David Z., Vaidman, Lev·1988·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We have found that the usual measuring procedure for preselected and postselected ensembles of quantum systems gives unusual results. Under some natural conditions of weakness of the measurement, its result consistently defines a new kind of value for a quantum variable, which we call the weak value. A description of the measurement of the weak value of a component of a spin for an ensemble of preselected and postselected spin-(1/2 particles is presented.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.60.1351

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The weak value of an observable can be beyond the usual range of eigenvalues of that observable, referred as amplification effect for weak signal.

    “In the weak measurement the induced weak value of the observable on the measured system is usually a complex number, and can be beyond the usual range of eigenvalues of that observable.This property of weak value is referred as the amplification effect for weak signal”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Y. Aharonov, 1987, Phys. Lett. A, 124, 199, 10.1016/0375-9601(87)90619-0 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Aharonov, Y., Albert, D. Z., & Vaidman, L.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1988-04-04
Volume
60
Issue
14
Pages
1351-1354
ISSN
0031-9007
Cited by
2,297
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review