Cited by 547

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ultra-large-scale continuous-variable cluster states multiplexed in the time domain

Yokoyama, Shota, Ukai, Ryuji, Armstrong, Seiji C., Sornphiphatphong, Chanond, Kaji, Toshiyuki, Suzuki, Shigenari, Yoshikawa, Jun-ichi, Yonezawa, Hidehiro, Menicucci, Nicolas C., Furusawa, Akira·2013·Nature Photonics

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nphoton.2013.287

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several approaches for single-photon sources have been developed in the last decades.

    “Several approaches for single-photon sources have been developed in the last decades (see Table 2) [172][173][174][175].”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [174]

    The main text discusses approaches to generating continuous-variable cluster states and notes probabilistic photon-pair generation, but it does not discuss the development of several approaches to single-photon sources. A search for single-photon sources and single-photon generation found no passage addressing that claim; no page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Raussendorf, R. & Briegel, H. J. A one-way quantum computer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5188–5191 (2001). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Briegel, H. J. & Raussendorf, R. Persistent entanglement in arrays of interacting particles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 910–913 (2001). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Yao, X.-C. et al. Observation of eight-photon entanglement. Nature Photon. 6, 225–228 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Su, X. et al. Experimental preparation of eight-partite cluster state for photonic qumodes. Opt. Lett. 37, 5178–5180 (2012). · DOI
  5. Monz, T. et al. 14-Qubit entanglement: creation and coherence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 130506 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Zhang, J. & Braunstein, S. L. Continuous-variable Gaussian analog of cluster states. Phys. Rev. A 73, 032318 (2006). · DOI
  7. Menicucci, N. C. et al. Universal quantum computation with continuous-variable cluster states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 110501 (2006). · DOI
  8. Furusawa, A. & van Loock, P. Quantum Teleportation and Entanglement (Wiley-VCH, 2011). · DOI
  9. Furusawa, A. et al. Unconditional quantum teleportation. Science 282, 706–709 (1998). · DOI · Paper page
  10. Lee, N. et al. Teleportation of nonclassical wave packets of light. Science 332, 330–333 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  11. Tokunaga, Y. et al. Generation of high-fidelity four-photon cluster state and quantum-domain demonstration of one-way quantum computing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 210501 (2008). · DOI
  12. Ukai, R. et al. Demonstration of unconditional one-way quantum computations for continuous variables. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 240504 (2011). · DOI
  13. Ukai, R., Yokoyama, S., Yoshikawa, J., van Loock, P. & Furusawa, A. Demonstration of a controlled-phase gate for continuous-variable one-way quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 250501 (2011). · DOI
  14. Yukawa, M., Ukai, R., van Loock, P. & Furusawa, A. Experimental generation of four-mode continuous-variable cluster states. Phys. Rev. A 78, 012301 (2008). · DOI
  15. Van Loock, P., Weedbrook, C. & Gu, M. Building Gaussian cluster states by linear optics. Phys. Rev. A 76, 032321 (2007). · DOI
  16. Armstrong, S. et al. Programmable multimode quantum networks. Nature Commun. 3, 1026 (2012). · DOI
  17. Pysher, M., Miwa, Y., Shahrokhshahi, R., Bloomer, R. & Pfister, O. Parallel generation of quadripartite cluster entanglement in the optical frequency comb. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 030505 (2011). · DOI
  18. Roslund, J., de Araújo, R. M., Jiang, S., Fabre, C. & Treps, N. Wavelength-multiplexed quantum network with ultrafast frequency combs. Preprint at http://lanl.arXiv.org/abs/1307.1216 (2013). · DOI
  19. Menicucci, N. C., Flammia, S. T. & Pfister, O. One-way quantum computing in the optical frequency comb. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 130501 (2008). · DOI
  20. Menicucci, N. C. Temporal-mode continuous-variable cluster states using linear optics. Phys. Rev. A 83, 062314 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  21. Usmani, I., Afzelius, M., de Riedmatten, H. & Gisin, N. Mapping multiple photonic qubits into and out of one solid-state atomic ensemble. Nature Commun. 1, 12 (2010). · DOI
  22. Gu, M., Weedbrook, C., Menicucci, N. C., Ralph, T. C. & van Loock, P. Quantum computing with continuous-variable clusters. Phys. Rev. A 79, 062318 (2009). · DOI
  23. Menicucci, N. C., Flammia, S. T. & van Loock, P. Graphical calculus for Gaussian pure states. Phys. Rev. A 83, 042335 (2011). · DOI
  24. Van Loock, P. & Furusawa, A. Detecting genuine multipartite continuous-variable entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 67, 052315 (2003). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yokoyama, S., Ukai, R., Armstrong, S. C., Sornphiphatphong, C., Kaji, T., Suzuki, S., Yoshikawa, J.-I., Yonezawa, H., Menicucci, N. C., & Furusawa, A.
Venue
Nature Photonics
Published
2013-11-17
Volume
7
Issue
12
Pages
982-986
ISSN
  • 1749-4885
  • 1749-4893
Cited by
547
References
6
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review