The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A quantum logic gate between a solid-state quantum bit and a photon
Open accessAbstract
Integrated nanophotonic devices create strong light–matter interactions that are important for the development of solid-state quantum networks1, distributed quantum computers2 and ultralow-power optoelectronics3,4. A key component for many of these applications is the photonic quantum logic gate, where the quantum state of a solid-state quantum bit (qubit) conditionally controls the state of a photonic qubit. These gates are crucial for the development of robust quantum networks5,6,7, non-destructive quantum measurements8,9 and strong photon–photon interactions10. Here, we experimentally realize a quantum logic gate between an optical photon and a solid-state qubit. The qubit is composed of a quantum dot strongly coupled to a nanocavity, which acts as a coherently controllable qubit system that conditionally flips the polarization of a photon on picosecond timescales, implementing a controlled-NOT gate. Our results represent an important step towards solid-state quantum networks and provide a versatile approach for probing quantum dot–photon interactions on ultrafast timescales. Researchers realize a quantum logic gate by performing all-optical coherent control of the exciton states of an InAs quantum dot in a photonic crystal cavity in the strong-coupling regime. Their demonstrations represent an important step towards realizing robust and scalable quantum networks and generating strong photon-photon interactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics
Knill, E., Laflamme, R., & Milburn, G. J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35051009 · Cited by 5,880
Quantum State Transfer and Entanglement Distribution among Distant Nodes in a Quantum Network
Cirac, J. I., Zoller, P., Kimble, H. J., & Mabuchi, H. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.3221 · Cited by 2,215
Cited by
Interfacing single photons and single quantum dots with photonic nanostructures
Lodahl, P., Mahmoodian, S., & Stobbe, S. (2015) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.347 · Cited by 1,465
Modified spontaneous emission in nanophotonic structures
Pelton, M. (2015) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2015.103 · Cited by 673
Near-Unity Coupling Efficiency of a Quantum Emitter to a Photonic Crystal Waveguide
Arcari, M., Söllner, I., Javadi, A., Lindskov Hansen, S., Mahmoodian, S., Liu, J., Thyrrestrup, H., Lee, E. H., Song, J. D., Stobbe, S., et al. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.093603 · Cited by 600
Nanophotonic quantum phase switch with a single atom
Tiecke, T. G., Thompson, J. D., de Leon, N. P., Liu, L. R., Vuletić, V., & Lukin, M. D. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13188 · Cited by 558
Nanoscale optical positioning of single quantum dots for bright and pure single-photon emission
Sapienza, L., Davanço, M., Badolato, A., & Srinivasan, K. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms8833 · Cited by 344
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, H., Bose, R., Shen, T. C., Solomon, G. S., & Waks, E.
- Venue
- Nature Photonics
- Published
- 2013-03-31
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 373-377
- ISSN
- 1749-4885 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-4893
- OpenAlex
- W2071387826
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A quantum logic gate between a solid-state quantum bit and a photon. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nphoton.2013.48
- The paper
- Kim, H., Bose, R., Shen, T. C., Solomon, G. S., & Waks, E. (2013). A quantum logic gate between a solid-state quantum bit and a photon. Nature Photonics. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2013.48
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.