Cited by 309Quantum Information and CryptographyOptical Wireless Communication TechnologiesWireless Communication Security Techniques

Direct and full-scale experimental verifications towards ground–satellite quantum key distribution

Open access
Wang, Jian-Yu, Yang, Bin, Liao, Sheng-Kai, Zhang, Liang, Shen, Qi, Hu, Xiao-Fang, Wu, Jin-Cai, Yang, Shi-Ji +16 more·2013·Nature Photonics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nphoton.2013.89

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The key analysis does not consider information leakage due to possible side channels such as imperfect spatial, temporal and spectral overlap of the quantum light sources.

    “As in previous experiments 24,25 , here the key analysis doesn't consider information leakage due to possible side channels such as the imperfect spatial, temporal and spectral overlap of the quantum light sources.”

    From Satellite-to-ground quantum key distribution (2017) · cites this paper as [24]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, J.-Y., Yang, B., Liao, S.-K., Zhang, L., Shen, Q., Hu, X.-F., Wu, J.-C., Yang, S.-J., Jiang, H., Tang, Y.-L., Zhong, B., Liang, H., Liu, W.-Y., Hu, Y.-H., Huang, Y.-M., Qi, B., Ren, J.-G., Pan, G.-S., Yin, J., Jia, J.-J., Chen, Y.-A., Chen, K., Peng, C.-Z., & Pan, J.-W.
Affiliations
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Ningbo University (CN)
  • Institute of Optics and Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Peng, Cheng-Zhi
  • Pan, Jian-Wei
Venue
Nature Photonics
Published
2013-04-21
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
387-393
ISSN
  • 1749-4885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-4893
OpenAlex
W2017527397
Cited by
309
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 9
FWCI
30.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Photonics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optical Wireless Communication Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Wireless Communication Security Techniques
Keywords
quantum key distribution, free-space quantum communication, decoy-state QKD, low Earth orbit satellites, moving platform, experimental validation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review