Cited by 238Quantum Information and CryptographyWireless Communication Security TechniquesOptical Wireless Communication Technologies

Ground to satellite secure key exchange using quantum cryptography

Open access
Rarity, J G, Tapster, P R, Gorman, P M, Knight, P·2002·New Journal of Physics

Abstract

We examine the possibility of secure key exchange between a ground station and a low earth orbit satellite using the technique of quantum cryptography. The study suggests there are no technical obstacles to building a system that could exchange keys at kilobaud rates between a metre diameter telescope on the ground and a satellite with a 10 cm diameter lightweight telescope.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1367-2630/4/1/382

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Satellite-based QKD promises to establish a global-scale quantum network by exploiting the negligible photon loss and decoherence in empty space.

    “Satellite-based QKD promises to establish a global-scale quantum network by exploiting the negligible photon loss and decoherence in the empty out space.”

    From Satellite-to-ground quantum key distribution (2017) · cites this paper as [19]

  • The satellite-to-ground connection has significantly reduced losses compared with terrestrial channels.

    “Compared with terrestrial channels, the satellite-to-ground connection has significantly reduced losses 19 .”

    From Satellite-to-ground quantum key distribution (2017) · cites this paper as [19]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Brassard G and Salvail L 1994 Secret key reconciliation by public discussion, adventures in cryptology EUROCRYPT93 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol 765) (New York: Springer) pp 410-23

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rarity, J. G., Tapster, P. R., Gorman, P. M., & Knight, P.
Affiliations
Qinetiq (United Kingdom) (GB)
Venue
New Journal of Physics
Published
2002-10-29
Volume
4
Pages
82-82
ISSN
1367-2630 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2070694402
Cited by
238
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 17
FWCI
9.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • New Journal of Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Wireless Communication Security Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optical Wireless Communication Technologies
Keywords
quantum key distribution, low Earth orbit satellites, secure key exchange, ground station

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review