Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,043

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mott physics and band topology in materials with strong spin–orbit interaction

Open access
Pesin, Dmytro, Balents, Leon·2010·Nature Physics

Abstract

Mott insulators are driven by strong Coulomb repulsion and topological insulators by strong spin–orbit coupling. Although these effects are normally in competition, in some cases the Coulomb interaction can enhance the effects of spin–orbit coupling. Together these interactions could lead to gapless spin-only excitations on the surface of a strongly correlated insulator.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nphys1606

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 1,043

Metadata

Authors
Pesin, D., & Balents, L.
Venue
Nature Physics
Published
2010-03-21
Volume
6
Issue
5
Pages
376-381
ISSN
  • 1745-2473 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-2481
OpenAlex
W2003531965
Cited by
1,043
References
35
FWCI
55.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.