CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 128

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Heralded noiseless amplification of a photon polarization qubit

Kocsis, S., Xiang, G. Y., Ralph, T. C., Pryde, G. J.·2013·Nature Physics
DOI 10.1038/nphys2469
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nphys2469

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two approaches exist to circumvent these issues: reducing the transmission loss using free-space communication and decoherence-free subspaces, or employing quantum repeaters.

    “Notwithstanding, two approaches exist to circumvent these issues: reducing the transmission loss using free-space communication [43,96,105,348,350,351,393-399] and decoherencefree subspaces [42,116,385,386,[388][389][390][391], or employing quantum repeaters.”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [396]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • Quantum cryptography

    Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W., & Zbinden, H. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.145 · Cited by 8,515

  • A single quantum cannot be cloned

    Wootters, W. K., & Zurek, W. H. (1982) · Nature · doi:10.1038/299802a0 · Cited by 5,406 · cited 1×

    “Non-deterministic noiseless amplification of a single mode [1-4] can circumvent the unique challenges to amplifying a quantum signal, such as the no-cloning theorem [5], and the minimum noise cost for deterministic quantum state amplification [6].”
    Background

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Xiang, G. Y., Ralph, T. C., Lund, A. P., Walk, N. & Pryde, G. J. Heralded noiseless linear amplification and distillation of entanglement. Nature Photon. 4, 316–319 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Ferreyrol, F. et al. Implementation of a nondeterministic optical noiseless amplifier. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 123603 (2010). · DOI
  3. Zavatta, A., Fiurášek, J. & Bellini, M. A high-fidelity noiseless amplifier for quantum light states. Nature Photon. 5, 52–60 (2010). · DOI
  4. Usuga, M. A. et al. Noise-powered probabilistic concentration of phase information. Nature Phys. 6, 767–771 (2010). · DOI
  5. Osorio, C. I. et al. Heralded photon amplification for quantum communication. Phys. Rev. A 86, 023815 (2012). · DOI
  6. Caves, C. M. Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferometer. Phys. Rev. D 23, 1693–1708 (1981). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Gisin, N., Pironio, S. & Sangouard, N. Proposal for implementing device-independent quantum key distribution based on a heralded qubit amplifier. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 070501 (2010). · DOI
  8. Minar, J., de Riedmatten, H. & Sangouard, N. Quantum repeaters based on heralded qubit amplifiers. Phys. Rev. A 85, 032313 (2012). · DOI
  9. Nielsen, M. N. & Chuang, I. L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000).
  10. Shaji, A. & Caves, C. M. Qubit metrology and decoherence. Phys. Rev. A 76, 032111 (2008). · DOI
  11. Gao, W-B. et al. Experimental demonstration of a hyper-entangled ten-qubit Schrödinger cat state. Nature Phys. 6, 331–335 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  12. Kwiat, P. G., Eberhard, P. H., Steinberg, A. M. & Chiao, R. Y. Proposal for a loophole-free Bell inequality experiment. Phys. Rev. A 49, 3209–3220 (1994). · DOI
  13. Pitkaens, D., Ma, X., Wickert, R., van Loock, P. & Lütkenhaus, N. Efficient heralding of photonics quits with applications to device-independent quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. A 84, 022325 (2011). · DOI
  14. Kok, P., Lee, H. & Dowling, J. P. Single-photon quantum-nondemolition detectors constructed with linear optics and projective measurements. Phys. Rev. A 66, 063814 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
  15. Blandino, R. et al. Improving the maximum transmission distance of continuous-variable quantum key distribution using a noiseless amplifier. Phys. Rev. A 86, 012327 (2012). · DOI
  16. Mičuda, M. et al. Noiseless loss suppression in quantum optical communication. Phys. Rev. Lett. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/pdf/1206.2852.pdf (2012). · DOI
  17. Bennett, C. H. & Brassard, G. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Computers, Systems and Signal Processing Bangalore, India 175 (IEEE, 1984).
  18. Pegg, D. T., Phillips, L. S. & Barnett, S. M. Optical state truncation by projection synthesis. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1604–1606 (1998). · DOI
  19. Babichev, S. A., Ries, J. & Lvovsky, A. I. Quantum scissors: Teleportation of single-mode optical states by means of a nonlocal single photon. Europhys. Lett. 64, 1–7 (2003). · DOI
  20. White, A. G. et al. Measuring two-qubit gates. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 24, 172–183 (2007). · DOI
  21. Berry, D. W. & Lvovsky, A. I. Preservation of loss in linear-optical processing. Phys. Rev. A 84, 042304 (2011). · DOI
  22. Tanida, M., Okamoto, R. & Takeuchi, S. Highly indistinguishable heralded single-photon sources using parametric down conversion. Opt. Express 20, 15275–15285 (2012). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kocsis, S., Xiang, G. Y., Ralph, T. C., & Pryde, G. J.
Venue
Nature Physics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2012-11-11
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
23-28
ISSN
  • 1745-2473
  • 1745-2481
DOI
10.1038/nphys2469
Cited by
128
References
2
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review