The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Heralded noiseless linear amplification and distillation of entanglement
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Two approaches exist to circumvent these issues: reducing the transmission loss using free-space communication and decoherence-free subspaces, or employing quantum repeaters.
“Notwithstanding, two approaches exist to circumvent these issues: reducing the transmission loss using free-space communication [43,96,105,348,350,351,393-399] and decoherencefree subspaces [42,116,385,386,[388][389][390][391], or employing quantum repeaters.”
From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [395]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A single quantum cannot be cloned
Wootters, W. K., & Zurek, W. H. (1982) · Nature · doi:10.1038/299802a0 · Cited by 5,406 · cited 1×
“Deterministic, noiseless linear amplification is impossibl”
Quantum optical metrology – the lowdown on high-N00N states
Dowling, J. P. (2008) · Contemporary Physics · doi:10.1080/00107510802091298 · Cited by 894
Entanglement-free Heisenberg-limited phase estimation
Higgins, B. L., Berry, D. W., Bartlett, S. D., Wiseman, H. M., & Pryde, G. J. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06257 · Cited by 628
Self-citationOptical coherence: A convenient fiction
Mølmer, K. (1997) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.55.3195 · Cited by 223
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Caves, C. M. Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferometer. Phys. Rev. D 23, 1693–1708 (1981). · DOI · Paper page
- Bachor, H.-A. & Ralph, T. C. A Guide to Experiments in Quantum Optics 2nd edn (Wiley-VCH, 2004). · DOI
- Duan, L.-M. & Guo, G.-C. Probabilistic cloning and identification of linearly independent quantum states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4999–5002 (1998). · DOI
- Bennett, C. H. et al. Purification of noisy entanglement and faithful teleportation via noisy channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 722–725 (1996). · DOI · Paper page
- Furusawa, A. et al. Unconditional quantum teleportation. Science, 282, 706–709 (1998). · DOI · Paper page
- Braunstein, S. L. & Kimble, H. J. Dense coding for continuous variables. Phys. Rev. A 61, 042302 (2000). · DOI
- Ralph, T. C. & Huntington, E. H. Unconditional continuous variable dense coding. Phys. Rev. A 66, 042321 (2002). · DOI
- Grosshans, F. Grangier, P. Continuous variable quantum cryptography using coherent states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 057902 (2002). · DOI
- Silberhorn, Ch., Ralph, T. C., Lütkenhaus, N. & Leuchs, G. Continuous variable key distribution—beating the 3 dB loss limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 167901 (2002). · DOI
- Pegg, D. T., Phillips, L. S. & Barnett S. M. Optical state truncation by projection synthesis. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1604–1606 (1998). · DOI
- Babichev, S. A., Ries, J. & Lvovsky, A. I. Quantum scissors: teleportation of single-mode optical states by means of a nonlocal single photon. Europhys. Lett. 64, 1–7 (2003). · DOI
- Chou, C. W. et al. Measurement-induced entanglement for excitation stored in remote atomic ensembles. Nature 438, 828–832 (2005). · DOI
- Ou, Z. Y., Pereira, S. F., Kimble, H. J. & Peng, K. C. Realization of the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox for continuous variables. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3663–3666 (1992). · DOI
- Ralph, T. C. & Lund, A. P. Nondeterministic noiseless linear amplification of quantum systems. in Proceedings of 9th International Conferenceon on Quantum Communication Measurement and Computing (ed. Lvovsky, A.) 155–160 (AIP, 2009).
- Browne, D. E., Eisert, J., Scheel, S. & Plenio, M. B. Driving non-Gaussian to Gaussian states with linear optics. Phys. Rev. A 67, 062320 (2003). · DOI · Paper page
- Lund, A. P. & Ralph, T. C. Continuous-variable entanglement distillation over a general lossy channel. Phys. Rev. A 80, 032309 (2009). · DOI
- Hage, B. et al. Preparation of distilled and purified continuous-variable entangled states. Nature Phys. 4, 915–918 (2008). · DOI
- Dong, R. et al. Experimental entanglement distillation of mesoscopic quantum states. Nature Phys. 4, 919–923 (2008). · DOI
- Takahashi, H. et al. Entanglement distillation from Gaussian input states. Nature Photon. 4, 178–181 (2010). · DOI
- Andersen, U. L., Josse, V. & Leuchs, G. Unconditional quantum cloning of coherent states with linear optics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 240503 (2005). · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Photonic quantum information processing: a review
Flamini, F., Spagnolo, N., & Sciarrino, F. (2019) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aad5b2 · Cited by 770
Photonic quantum information processing: a concise review
Slussarenko, S., & Pryde, G. J. (2019) · Applied Physics Reviews · doi:10.1063/1.5115814 · Cited by 644
Self-citationBonneau, D., Lobino, M., Jiang, P., Natarajan, C. M., Tanner, M. G., Hadfield, R. H., Dorenbos, S. N., Zwiller, V., Thompson, M. G., & O’Brien, J. L. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.053601 · Cited by 99
The Schmidt number as a universal entanglement measure
Sperling, J., & Vogel, W. (2011) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/0031-8949/83/04/045002 · Cited by 96
Metadata
- Authors
- Xiang, G. Y., Ralph, T. C., Lund, A. P., Walk, N., & Pryde, G. J.
- Venue
- Nature Photonics
- Published
- 2010-03-28
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 316-319
- ISSN
- 1749-4885
- 1749-4893
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review