Cited by 133Quantum and electron transport phenomenaSemiconductor Quantum Structures and DevicesDiamond and Carbon-based Materials Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Optically detected coherent spin dynamics of a single electron in a quantum dot

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nphys736

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The potential threat represented by Shor's algorithm has led to new developments in classical cryptographic approaches, with work on post-quantum cryptography and quantum cryptography (QKD).

    “In fact the potential threat represented by the Shor's algorithm has led to new developments in classical cryptographic approaches, with the work on post-quantum cryptography and on a completely new paradigm to grant security named quantum cryptography [43], or more precisely Quantum-Key Distribution (QKD).”

    From Quantum Computing: Vision and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [43]

  • DI-QKD is difficult to implement and its performance in a practical scenario is still limited because it requires loophole-free Bell inequality violations, which necessitate high-quality entanglement among distant parties and near-perfect quantum detection.

    “However, DI-QKD is difficult to implement and its performance, on a practical scenario, are still limited [43] because it requires loophole-free Bell inequality violations, which necessitate high-quality entanglement among distant parties and near-perfect quantum detection, something current technologies cannot still provide in full [57], or at least not under commonly accepted practicality assum”

    From Quantum Computing: Vision and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [43]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mikkelsen, M. H., Berezovsky, J., Stoltz, N. G., Coldren, L. A., & Awschalom, D. D.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Corresponding author
Awschalom, D. D.
Venue
Nature Physics
Published
2007-10-07
Volume
3
Issue
11
Pages
770-773
ISSN
  • 1745-2473 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-2481
OpenAlex
W2024515933
Cited by
133
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 13
FWCI
10.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nature Physics (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Quantum and electron transport phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
Keywords
electron spin dynamics, quantum dots, single electron spin, coherent spin precession, general intelligence, spin lifetime, qubits, quantum information processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review