Cited by 16Treatment of Major DepressionSchizophrenia research and treatmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Erratum: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Active-Reference, Double-Blind, Flexible-Dose Study of the Efficacy of Vortioxetine on Cognitive Function in Major Depressive Disorder

Open access
Mahableshwarkar, Atul R, Zajecka, John, Jacobson, William, Chen, Yinzhong, Keefe, Richard SE·2016·Neuropsychopharmacology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/npp.2016.181

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mahableshwarkar, A. R., Zajecka, J., Jacobson, W., Chen, Y., & Keefe, R. S.
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2016-10-11
Volume
41
Issue
12
Pages
2961-2961
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W4244647244
Cited by
15
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
vortioxetine, major depressive disorder, cognitive function, antidepressant efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review